22:02:40 #startmeeting Xubuntu 22:02:40 Meeting started Sun Sep 11 22:02:40 2011 UTC. The chair is charlie-tca. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot. 22:02:40 22:02:40 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 22:03:05 [TOPIC] Agenda for today's meeting: 22:03:31 #topic Agenda for today's meeting: 22:03:36 Oh goody 22:03:55 * Old business 22:03:57 * Team updates 22:03:59 * Packaging & Development 22:04:01 * Bug Triage & Testing 22:04:03 * Website & Marketing 22:04:05 * Artwork 22:04:07 * Documentation 22:04:09 * Announcements 22:04:11 * Governance structure 22:04:13 * Any Other Business 22:04:15 Reminder: please use ".." on separate line when you've finished typing. If someone wants to comment during the updates, please "o/", so we know to wait. 22:05:13 The agenda is at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Meetings 22:05:15 [TOPIC] === Old Business === 22:05:35 * charlie-tca to get FFe filed for xubuntu-meta to add blueman to seeds 22:05:50 o/ 22:05:55 With this, I notified the release manager we will need FFe's to get this done, and they will be accepted 22:06:03 go ahead, micahg 22:06:29 are we sure we need this? bluetooth seemed to work fine, but I have to verify it again after I restore a more default configuration on my armel laptop 22:07:10 .. 22:07:19 If you can verify it works without gnome-control-center, we don't need blueman 22:08:07 ok, will keep you advised 22:08:22 yes, we will, because blueman can take the place of gnome-control-center which causes a crash report if it is not installed and bluetooth is clicked when you have no devices 22:08:28 I think it works, except that you're unable to configure it 22:08:53 So, for configuration purposes, we need blueman 22:09:00 I still seemed able to configure with the indicator 22:09:12 but I might have had some extra packages installed 22:09:19 yup 22:09:34 Please do verify if it works without g-c-c 22:10:02 [TOPIC] === Team updates === 22:10:17 [TOPIC] ==== Packaging & Development ==== 22:10:25 mr_pouit: your turn, sir 22:11:19 uploaded some bugfix for xfce4-session, xfdesktop4, xfce4-indicator-plugin; fixed build failure of tumbler; fixed plymouth script for xubuntu-logo. 22:11:36 oh, xterm/uxterm was hidden from the menu also 22:12:00 (some memleak fixes for ristretto) 22:12:37 and micahg has been investiguating bluetooth and some recents debian uploads (if/which ones we need to sync)1 22:12:46 investigating? 22:12:49 meh 22:12:51 .. 22:12:53 You been busy again! Thank you very much for your hard work. 22:12:56 o/ 22:13:06 Thank you, micahg also. It is very much appreciated 22:13:11 go ahead, micahg 22:13:19 maco fixed the printer dialog issue 22:13:21 .. 22:13:30 Yes! and it works, too 22:13:48 (indeed, sorry, I forgot this one too) 22:14:15 as to syncs, I hear Dutch translations are being pushed out by Xfce, so if possible, we want those 22:14:51 yep, will keep an eye out, Thu Sep 29 is final freeze for images though 22:14:58 There are supposed to be at least 10 packages upgraded this week 22:15:17 Sept 15 is beta2 freeze 22:15:28 yeah, I told Pjotr to see upstream for the translations, and he pushed a bit Nick, so we might have new bugfix releases in the next few days 22:15:51 May as well get them in. 22:16:08 They are planning to push the latest gnome upgrades in on Sept 19 22:16:21 [TOPIC] ==== Bug Triage & Testing ==== 22:16:21 so, right after beta 2 would probably be the time to land those new upstreams 22:16:45 no, if we can, we need them in beta2 to get them tested as much as we can 22:16:58 freeze for that is thursday :) 22:17:01 yup 22:17:43 Testing is hit and miss this week 22:18:03 With the gnome upgrades coming in, we need to hit the images hard to make sure they work 22:18:22 All tests need to be done this week, and again Saturday/Sunday. 22:18:42 If gnome breaks things, we will revert to the last working images for Beta2 22:19:13 Seeing quite a few bugs coming in, we picked up a couple more bug reporters with beta1 22:19:40 Any questions? 22:20:01 [TOPIC] ==== Website & Marketing ==== 22:20:21 pleia2, knome : any updates? 22:20:28 pending on canonical IS 22:20:29 I know it is waiting for IS now, too. 22:21:00 yeah, nothing else happening now 22:21:01 knome: thank you for the updated logos 22:21:12 We got them into beta1, even! 22:21:13 np 22:21:18 good to hear that 22:21:24 they are fine? 22:21:42 They are from my view, yes 22:21:47 good 22:22:27 [TOPIC] ==== Artwork ==== 22:22:38 ochosi, madnick : Any news? 22:23:01 I dont have any 22:23:19 probably no updates then, haven't seen ochosi much lately 22:23:37 We are looking very good right now. Artwork is in good shape, and people are happy with what they see. 22:23:46 [TOPIC] === Announcements === 22:23:52 (Lightdm greeter theme might come, maybe) 22:24:17 That would be great if we can make it happen. 22:24:34 I do have the bug yet, and am still pushing 22:24:39 * The next meeting will be on Monday, 2011-09-19 at 19:00 UTC 22:24:41 * Important dates coming up: 22:24:43 * We are now in UI Freeze 22:24:45 * 11.10 Beta2 freeze: September 15 22:24:47 * 11.10 Beta2: September 2 22:24:49 * 11.10 Release Date: October 13, 2011 22:24:51 * We need to update the Team Reports this week. 22:24:53 * gnome updates will be dropped on September 19. Since that is so close to beta2, it is vital we get the images on the 17th and 18th. If the upgrade to gnome makes the images unusable, we will use the last known good image. 22:24:57 We really need to be on top of the testing this week, please! 22:25:23 [TOPIC] === Any Other Business === 22:25:41 This is a good time to bring up any thing you want to discuss... 22:25:54 Are there any questions? 22:26:09 going once... 22:26:10 o/ 22:26:15 go ahead, micahg 22:26:40 just an FYI, the final Firefox and Thunderbird builds for oneiric will be landing after beta 2 due to the upstream schedule 22:26:53 We'll be shipping version 7 of each 22:26:59 .. 22:27:00 Very minimal chance of breaking things, right? 22:27:04 yep 22:27:11 we'll have the final beta for beta 2 22:27:19 Kind of scared of the gnome upgrades, myself 22:27:42 going... 2 22:28:11 Thank you all for participating in the meeting. It is always great to see so many interested in shaping Xubuntu, as a project!@ 22:28:26 o/ 22:28:31 Go ahead 22:28:48 heh, about the e-mail WRT the linkedin group, is that something the project wants? 22:28:55 .. 22:29:17 I answered that I don't use it, any one have an opinion on it? 22:29:37 * micahg uses linkedin, it's nice for networking 22:30:25 seems to be a very limited thing :( 22:30:41 why would one need Xubuntu *Users* in linkedin? 22:30:56 I've an account there as well, but I don't go there very often... 22:30:56 The email was to devel only, I thing 22:31:00 The email was to devel only, I think 22:31:07 but it was about users group 22:31:14 in linkedin 22:31:25 and the guy asked for official approval 22:31:28 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2011-September/007970.html 22:31:34 can anyone of us even give that? 22:31:53 * micahg would think that's up to charlie-tca as project lead 22:32:00 What do you call groups in linedin? I suspect the "users group" is a generic term there 22:32:14 you can have a group for anything you want 22:32:20 but, he asks "to be recognized by *Canonical*" 22:32:23 shouldn't we forward it to $random community manager? 22:32:23 it's a way to network, ask questions 22:32:31 which i think is correct 22:32:32 (jono? jcastro?) 22:32:36 they need to ask Canonical 22:32:41 jono prolly 22:32:47 why? xubuntu's a community project 22:32:57 Um, Canonical is not involved in Xubuntu, but I will go hunt down either jono or jorge and ask them about it 22:33:20 what i'm kind of thinking is 22:33:25 I don't believe Canonical will care either way, other than use of trademarks 22:33:25 who is administrating the group? 22:33:37 yeah, but canonical owns *buntu trademarks, so maybe they want to administer the linkedin group? 22:33:48 if it's an official, canonical/xubuntu recognized group, shouldn't one of them/us be the admin? 22:33:50 I can ask 22:34:08 it would probable be an open group anyways 22:34:15 i'm not on linkedin myself, so i don't know much about the system 22:34:37 micahg, but the admin can change it to closed anyday, and make some unwanted changes there? 22:34:45 and if we are not members on linkedin, we can't actually be admins there either 22:34:56 micahg, and he'd get all of the joined people in a puddle of mud? 22:35:02 charlie-tca, exactly. 22:35:15 charlie-tca, that's another reason why jono/jcastro might come in handy. :) 22:35:22 well, then the users of the group would be notified and have the option to leave 22:35:42 micahg, well of course, but that would still be bad for xubuntu, in a way 22:35:43 I expect it is similar to a group on indenti.ca, twitter, facebook, etc 22:36:01 yup 22:36:13 imo, any group that is called "official", should be something that a xubuntu developer is an admin in 22:36:24 The only difference is this person dared to ask for permission 22:36:33 * micahg could be an admin if charlie-tca wanted 22:36:51 charlie-tca, yeah, that makes it "official" :) 22:36:53 I will bring the discussion up to jono or jorge and get a reading 22:37:07 Any thing else to discuss? 22:37:14 yeah, let's ask jono &/ jorge first :) 22:37:18 Let's go to work 22:37:28 #endmeeting