14:31 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:31 Meeting started at 14:31:14 UTC. The chair is slyon. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:31 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:31 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage pushkarnk ( dviererbe ) 14:31 #topic current component mismatches 14:31 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:31 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:31 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:31 The archive is still frozen post-Plucky release. So nothing new, as expected. 14:31 good morning 14:31 #topic New MIRs 14:31 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:32 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:32 o/ 14:32 empty \o/ 14:32 o/ 14:32 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:32 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:32 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:32 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2072561 was given back to the reporter. sarnold did your already ping them directly to check-in on the status going forward? 14:33 also a non-update (resource constraints) in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-broker/+bug/2015538 14:33 slyon: no, rodrigo added his comment after that conversation, so I felt that was enough to move on to other things, I didn't want to be pestering 14:34 sarnold: OK. wfm, I think that should be good enough. 14:34 #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:34 Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:34 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:34 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:35 nothing new AFAICT 14:35 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:35 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:35 https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues/83 14:35 it might be worth rechecking the "hoping someone raises a hand" for #83, about component-mismatches 14:36 new cycle, new team members, etc :) 14:36 (alas, it's not *me*, but still, cycle opening is a decent time to at least ask) 14:37 I'll dare to take it :) 14:37 right. IIRC pushkarnk1 showed some interest in the past. 14:37 woo, thanks pushkarnk1 :) 14:37 right. There might potentially also be support from Foundations people on improving the distro tooling going forward. 14:38 yay :) 14:38 So, let's move on with security topics: 14:38 Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. 14:38 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0 14:38 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir&orderby=-date_last_updated&start=0 14:38 Internal link 14:38 #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 14:38 sarnold: how did we finish the Plucky cycle and how are we moving forward? 14:39 The board is looking rather clean! 14:39 from my perspective plucky went pretty well 14:39 I'm still very sad to lose eslerm, he helped the whole thing run so much smoother than I did, but the rest of the team really pitched in did great work 14:40 and we've got enough different people picking these up that it feels like a different time entirely, a far cry from the days when I was the only one doing them. it's a nice change :) 14:41 That's good to hear. Have you as a single point of failure would be bad :) 14:41 we still have huge obligations elsewhere, but once in a while we can direct the attentions fo multiple people, and pdfio is elise's first package to review, so we're even still growing capability :) 14:42 yes, yes it was, the conversations used to be a lot less happy.. 14:42 And I'm glad that others are ready to pick up such reviews, too! 14:42 nice. Thanks for the update! 14:42 #topic Any other business? 14:42 Do we have anything else? 14:42 nothing from me 14:42 nothing from me 14:43 Okay, let's keep it short. 14:43 3 .. 14:43 i'm sure we've got other tooling that needs a nudge, so non-pushkarnk1 folks maybe consider grabbing something? or dragoon other team members? :) 14:43 2 .. 14:44 IIUC there is some capacity planned to improve tooling, but obviouly we cannot tackle all at once. let's see what they can come up with :) 14:44 1 .. 14:45 #endmeeting