== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by cpaelzer, 30 Apr at 14:34 — 14:53 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-04-30-14.34.log.html == Meeting summary == === current component mismatches === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:34. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (cpaelzer, 14:34) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (cpaelzer, 14:34) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:36. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:36) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:36. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:37) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2054480 (cpaelzer, 14:37) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2054480/comments/4 (cpaelzer, 14:40) === Process/Documentation improvements === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:44. * ''LINK:'' https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls (cpaelzer, 14:44) * ''LINK:'' https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues (cpaelzer, 14:44) === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:48. === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:51. == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (84) * sarnold (15) * eslerm_ (8) * meetingology (2) * slyon (2) * jamespage (1) * waveform (1) == Full log == 14:34 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:34 Meeting started at 14:34:11 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:34 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:34 Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) 14:34 o/ 14:34 so Oraculus Oraculous Ora... I still need to get this into my fingers 14:34 it opened 14:34 so we might see new things soon 14:34 #topic current component mismatches 14:34 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:34 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:35 it is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular 14:35 ok, no syncs or uploads yet 14:35 and noble is stable in regard to uploads 14:35 is that large 'beta' banner new? 14:35 ok, next section 14:35 I do not remember it from past releases 14:35 but could not guarantee that it is super new 14:35 ah focal has one too :) https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal 14:36 #topic New MIRs 14:36 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:36 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:36 it must be the section, hehe 14:36 I think that is for Buster not for Focal 14:36 anyway not going into that, also suggesting trixie here 14:36 no new open bugs 14:36 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:37 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:37 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:37 only recent update is 14:37 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2054480 14:37 ok, sarnold got to the shallow review we wanted 14:37 thakns 14:38 we won't add it to Noble based on that 14:38 but that means it is unblocked for 24.10 right? 14:39 yes, or 24.04.1 ought to be fine, too 14:39 the required TODOs are still a few non-trivial tests 14:39 and consider adding confinement as recommended todo 14:39 IIRC there were answers to that 14:39 checking ... 14:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2054480/comments/4 14:40 confining all the things would be nice, yeah, but the primary use of nbd-client is likely during early boot with 'fixed' values .. the remote peer will be serving a filesystem, so very very powerful 14:41 yes, the isolation is a "try to" ask 14:41 but the testing that was mentioned has not landed yet 14:41 I think the order from here is 14:41 1. land the testing that they mentions 14:41 2. continue trying to confine if possible 14:41 3. SRU at least the testing 14:42 actually 3. promoting in 24.10 14:42 then SRU 14:42 and then consider promoting in 24.04.1 14:42 waveform: ^ 14:44 updated the case 14:44 #topic Process/Documentation improvements 14:44 Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues 14:44 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls 14:44 #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues 14:44 nothing new 14:45 I added to my end-of-cycle comment 14:45 slyon, thanks -- I'll stick those on my todo list 14:45 I see 14:45 an issue from the late cycle request of qrtr/protection-domain-mapper is causing issues 14:45 the arm64 issues you mean? 14:45 yes 14:45 I wasn't even aware of those late additions 14:46 oh that is the x13s story 14:46 they were a late ask in mantic 14:46 I think xn_ox bought a new laptop :) 14:46 ok, it is a good "another example" to the problem overall 14:46 thanks eslerm_ 14:46 The action still didn't change 14:46 the packages looked dangerous, but were ack'd exculsively for x13s hardware enablement 14:47 Hmm 14:47 that adds the thought of "how to ensure limited acks stay limited" 14:47 I have no great suggestion to make yet, need to ponder about that ... 14:47 we all might need to, let me go on with the agenda for now 14:47 +1 14:48 #topic Any other business? 14:48 oh and more feedback on the topic above 14:48 you can be sure that I'll mention too huge too late changes in any 24.04 retrospective I'm in 14:48 not sure it will change things, but it is the right thing to d 14:48 o 14:49 other than that - nothing MIR'ish from me or server in general 14:49 are you thinking t64 or xz or boto? 14:49 "or ..." and that is the problem 14:49 but more t64, crisis, ... 14:49 huge things we could have done otherwise 14:49 not so much xz and boto which just fell onto us 14:49 but that is opinion 14:50 t64 really ought to have been done 22.10 or so 14:50 if we could keep the things we control in -dev 14:50 that would help 14:50 many things only happen when they become a crisis .. alas i'm guilty of this myself 14:50 yeah sarnold, exactly what you say 14:51 anything else else? 14:51 none here 14:51 nothing from my side 14:51 this is the last agenda item, so next would otherwise be closing 14:51 except to idly wonder what the next t64 is :) 14:51 none for me 14:51 sarnold: that is for a talk at beer'o'clock - not for this meeting 14:51 ok, thank you all 14:51 closing 14:51 #topic Any other business? 14:51 ooo lucky you, already ti feierabend :) 14:52 beer oclcock is a looong ways off.. 14:52 o/ 14:52 cpaelzer: btw that wasn't the usual #endmeeting :) 14:52 hehe 14:52 bad copy pasta 14:52 thanks cpaelzer, all :) 14:53 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)