== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team meeting, started by juliank, 29 Sep at 15:00 — 16:00 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-09-29-15.00.log.html == Meeting summary == * ''LINK:'' https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-29-september-2022/30898 (juliank, 15:01) === Release incoming bugs === Discussion started by juliank at 15:12. * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 15:12) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 15:21) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-triage-discuss-bug-tasks.html (juliank, 15:22) * ''LINK:'' https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-todo-bug-tasks.html (juliank, 15:45) === Team proposed-migration report === Discussion started by juliank at 15:55. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs (juliank, 15:55) === AOB === Discussion started by juliank at 15:55. == People present (lines said) == * juliank (74) * ubottu (15) * bdmurray (11) * bdrung (5) * xypron (3) * enr0n (3) * meetingology (2) * jawn-smith (2) * doko (2) * ginggs (1) * waveform (1) * mclemenceau (1) * schopin (1) == Full log == 15:00 #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team 15:00 Meeting started at 15:00:18 UTC. The chair is juliank. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:00 \o 15:00 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:00 \o 15:01 #link https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/foundations-team-updates-thursday-29-september-2022/30898 15:01 o/ 15:01 weekly status is there 15:01 o/ 15:01 I forgot mine :( 15:01 Let's all take our usual time to read and ask questions 15:02 o/ 15:05 enr0n: can you elaborate on bug 1964036? 15:05 Bug 1964036 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Firefox icon missing from panel following Kubuntu upgrade 20.04->22.04" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1964036 15:07 bdmurray: I did an upgrade attempt where I removed the firefox entry in deb2snap.json, so that u-r-u would not mess with the firefox snap or deb 15:07 xypron, regarding the gemmi failure: Why did you disable the tests on non-amd64 instead of fixing the test case? 15:07 When I did that, the icon was still missing on upgrade, suggesting that u-r-u is not the cause of that bug 15:09 Still shouldn't we not be removing the deb? 15:09 waveform: no it can't be added to your PPU but if you were a core dev! ;-) 15:10 Correct, we should let the deb handle the transition. I was just pointing out that the original issue raised in the bug is not fixed by us leaving the deb alone 15:10 bdmurray, I'm sure if someone checks the coverage of that PPU ... ;) 15:12 #topic Release incoming bugs 15:12 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-kk-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:13 bug 1990429 15:13 Bug 1990429 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "software-properties uses deprecated apt-key" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990429 15:13 bdrung: it is about mathematical accuracy. The same two tests are disabled on Windows for the same reason. 15:13 bdrung: we don't expect the exact same numbers on other architectures. 15:14 We had that last week already huh 15:14 tag it foundations-todo? 15:15 bug 1990202 15:15 Bug 1990202 in swtpm (Ubuntu) "Merge swtpm from Debian unstable" [Wishlist, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990202 15:15 we also looked at this last week 15:16 did we mean to untag this? 15:16 I'll do it 15:16 bug 1990856 15:16 Bug 1990856 in debootstrap (Ubuntu) "Does not consider all versions in Packages files" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990856 15:16 that sounds like not a bug 15:17 ah 15:17 o/ 15:18 seems valid 15:18 subscribing 15:18 bug 1097467 15:18 Bug 1097467 in bash (Ubuntu) "bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1097467 15:19 going through the same bugs every week not super helpful :D 15:20 this discussion needs to go upstream 15:21 Removing the tag, there isn't anything we can do here really 15:21 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-jj-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs 15:21 bug 1990586 15:22 I think there is a needs-forwarding response in the ubuntu-qa-tools scripts 15:22 Bug 1990586 in apt (Ubuntu) "22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990586 15:22 this in progress, going to fix up tags 15:22 end of list :D 15:22 let's look at foundations-triage-discuss bugs 15:22 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-triage-discuss-bug-tasks.html 15:23 bug 1991139 15:23 Bug 1991139 in apt (Ubuntu) "prompted to remove systemd-hwe-hwdb but re-installed via updates" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1991139 15:23 this is bug resulting from phasing implementation in update-manager and apt 15:23 so we solved dist-upgrade then keep back phased packages, but any dependencies they marked for install are still being marked for install 15:24 not super high priority, more of an annoyance 15:24 but needs to be fixed 15:24 subscribing the team 15:24 bug 1991083 15:24 Bug 1991083 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Resize error when installing alongside" [High, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1991083 15:25 bdmurray: what do you want to discuss? 15:25 fancy bug 15:25 I think it is important for the release and didn't want to just add it to todo w/o it also being added to the pulse 15:28 imported as FR-2732 15:29 (and tagged todo) 15:29 bug 1990520 15:29 Bug 1990520 in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems "[Ubuntu 22.04] zkey: Fix re-enciphering of EP11 identity key of KMIP plugin" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1990520 15:30 IMO we should tag it, it's on my personal todo anyway :) 15:30 not sure what KMIP is but this sounds important to get done and is just sponsoring, tag it todo 15:32 bug 1987924 15:32 Bug 1987924 in grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Jammy) "GRUB may execute the kernel w/ dirty instruction cache on arm64" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987924 15:32 This will happen in a couple of weeks 15:32 I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo? 15:33 bug 1987541 even less priority 15:33 Bug 1987541 in shim (Ubuntu) "shim executes GRUB w/ dirty instruction cache on arm64" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1987541 15:34 > I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo? 15:34 bug 1982511 15:34 Bug 1982511 in grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Focal) "Intermittent 'Synchronous Exception' on arm64" [High, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1982511 15:34 > I'm gonna subscribe foundations-bugs to it but not tag it todo? 15:36 bug 1920753 15:36 Bug 1920753 in build-essential (Ubuntu) "Cannot install build-essential on fresh Ubuntu 20.04.2 installation" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1920753 15:39 so this machine had updates pocket disabled but image was built with that 15:39 so he had libc6 ubuntu9.9 installed, but only ubuntu9.7 in the sources.list 15:39 which doesn't work 15:39 This is Invalid 15:40 It feels to me like we should be capturing sources.list in bug reports more regularly 15:41 bdmurray, feel free to open a bug report against apport to collect the sources.list by default 15:45 that's this list 15:45 let's investigate all our todo bugs 15:45 #link https://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/foundations-todo-bug-tasks.html 15:45 well, let's get an overview at least 15:46 looking at Importance Undecided, Status New 15:47 bug 1981109 15:47 Bug 1981109 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Jammy) "server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in every container" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1981109 15:48 is actualyl this todo?, ubuntu-meta is assigned to server? 15:48 ubuntu-meta is a shared package 15:51 let's ask steve about this, and continue with bug 1988710 15:51 Bug 1988710 in gcc "qemu FTBFS with GCC 12" [Medium, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1988710 15:51 false positive compiler warning 15:52 medium I'd say, easy to workaround anyway 15:52 doko: ^ 15:52 juliank: are you reading the description or comment #3? 15:52 it's upstreamed, do we care about alpha? 15:53 I just want to know which Importance to set :D 15:53 minor. there's a work-around, and we also could stop building the alpha qemu 15:54 that's it for Undecided New ones 15:55 #topic Team proposed-migration report 15:55 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs 15:55 it's empty 15:55 \o/ 15:55 #topic AOB 15:55 The apport SRUs are waiting to being accepted in -proposed. 15:56 I'm out next week 15:57 I'm out the week after next 15:57 Germany is out Monday :D 15:57 I 15:57 so I'm at an event next week, and travelling only, I won't be attending meets most likely 16:00 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)