14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:23 UTC.  The chair is cpaelzer.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:30 <joalif> o/
14:30 <cpaelzer> hiho sarnold didrocks slyon jamespage joalif
14:30 <cpaelzer> no previous actions to review
14:31 <slyon> heyhey! o/
14:31 <cpaelzer> let us get to the lists, accorindg to my inbox there might be a lot today
14:31 <jamespage> o/
14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches
14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:31 <cpaelzer> licensecheck would usually be foundations, seems like one of the explosions we also sometimes see with lintian
14:32 <cpaelzer> slyon: is this known in foundations already?
14:32 <slyon> nothing new, IMO. jaraco.context needs to be looked at by openstack
14:32 <slyon> cpaelzer: yes. the MIR is already filed: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1972853
14:32 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1972853 in libxs-parse-sublike-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] lib*-perl" [Undecided, Confirmed]
14:32 <cpaelzer> yes, but last week jamespage wasn't around
14:32 <cpaelzer> he is now
14:32 <slyon> we did a combined MIR for all of those *-perl packages
14:32 <cpaelzer> jamespage: are you ok to take jaraco to your team?
14:32 <cpaelzer> slyon: great
14:33 <slyon> (actuall, Simon did, kudos!)
14:33 <cpaelzer> on requests -> python-charset-normalizer, that was picke dup by server already (and had some help from people on +1 duty)
14:33 <jamespage> cpaelzer: yep
14:33 <cpaelzer> slyon: did that also include the perl things dependet on by sphinx?
14:33 <slyon> Yes, we had olivier look into requests a bit, too. I think there was some exchange with the server team happening
14:33 <cpaelzer> yes - that is what i referred to
14:34 <slyon> cpaelzer: yes. it also includes the sphinx changes. they are all very similar
14:34 <cpaelzer> libsoup is driven by the desktop team already
14:34 <cpaelzer> libqrtr-glib as well
14:34 <cpaelzer> nothing super new that needs action here I think
14:34 <slyon> ACK
14:34 <didrocks> o/
14:34 * cpaelzer feels good that teams are more on top of things nowadays!
14:34 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs
14:34 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing
14:35 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:35 <cpaelzer> yep that reflects what I meant with "seen many in my inbox"
14:35 <sarnold> wow
14:35 <cpaelzer> 13 to assign
14:36 <cpaelzer> of which 5 are hopefulyl-easy-perl cases
14:36 <jamespage> I can take that manila MIR - I've not been involved in that
14:36 <cpaelzer> didrocks: which of the desktop cases do you think benefit the most from you knowing Desktop better than the others?
14:36 <cpaelzer> thanks jamespage, assigning manila to you
14:36 <joalif> @cpaelzer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfreeaptx/+bug/1971767 shouldn't be there, i've done the review and got an ack from security too
14:36 <jamespage> beat you to it :)
14:37 <didrocks> cpaelzer: I think wireplumber, libsoup3, gnome-console
14:37 <cpaelzer> indeed joalif let me set the status right
14:37 <cpaelzer> didrocks: would you take these then
14:37 <didrocks> happy to take the 3 of them, not commiting to them for next week though
14:37 <cpaelzer> then we can re-look at the list and look to assign the rest starting with me and slyon
14:37 <cpaelzer> not-next-week is ok didrocks as long as it is not 6 weeks
14:37 <slyon> yes. and joalif possibly?
14:38 <didrocks> definitively won’t be 6
14:38 * didrocks just won 3 new tabs
14:38 <slyon> haha
14:38 <sarnold> hehhe
14:38 <cpaelzer> ok updated the freeaptx case joalif
14:38 <joalif> thanks
14:39 <cpaelzer> the perl'y things are probably all similar
14:40 <cpaelzer> and in the past often got a fast pass not needing security,but one never knows
14:40 <slyon> they should be straight forward, yes
14:40 <cpaelzer> and it should be joalif or me
14:40 <cpaelzer> let me try
14:40 <cpaelzer> that leaves libldac libqtr-glib and ruby-webrick for joalif and slyon
14:40 <cpaelzer> could you pick those as you see fit?
14:40 <joalif> so what do I get ?
14:40 <slyon> I dont know any of those, so don't care
14:41 <slyon> I can take the first two I guess :)
14:41 <joalif> me neither
14:41 <slyon> libldac and libqtr-glib
14:41 <slyon> that'd leave ruby-webrick for joalif ?
14:41 <joalif> and libdac ?
14:41 <cpaelzer> I have all assigned now
14:41 <cpaelzer> as discussed
14:41 <cpaelzer> thank you all
14:42 <slyon> joalif: I'll take libldac, too
14:42 <cpaelzer> with so much inbound and plenty of PTO days coming (christian central europe Thu + often Fri) and Memorial day in US we should try to be fast, but might not make all of them by next week
14:42 <cpaelzer> just to set expectations for anyone watching, these might take a bit more
14:42 <didrocks> just refreshing the page… feeling better
14:42 <sarnold> \o/
14:42 <cpaelzer> let us say 2 weeks :-)
14:43 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
14:43 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams
14:43 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:43 <sarnold> amurray finished libfreeaptx while I was asleep (distributed companies are neat :) and telegraf is in-progress, but this week is my cve triage week, so less progress there than one might wish
14:43 <sarnold> oh sigh I jumped the gun didn't it
14:43 <cpaelzer> you did
14:43 <cpaelzer> none of the incompletes needs our acation
14:43 <cpaelzer> one is from last weeks meeting
14:43 <cpaelzer> and the other was just a tracking change
14:44 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue
14:44 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?
14:44 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:44 <cpaelzer> see above :-)
14:44 <cpaelzer> seen freeaptx and glad to hear that telegraf is ongoing
14:44 <cpaelzer> sergiodj: ^^ FYI
14:44 <cpaelzer> sarnold: given the peak on the MIR queue today you can let the team know that quite likely a similar sized peak will hit your queue
14:45 <sarnold> *nod*
14:45 <cpaelzer> not all might need a security review
14:45 <cpaelzer> but relatively, there should be some
14:45 <sarnold> now would be a good time to ask if anyone would like a change of pace :)
14:45 <cpaelzer> TBH you (=security team) asked to get things early and we have seen many teams do so
14:45 <cpaelzer> so we should feel good about this
14:45 <sarnold> I do!
14:46 <didrocks> indeed, we are still far from FF
14:46 <cpaelzer> thanks on security then
14:46 <sarnold> it really does feel like things are clipping along nicely
14:46 <didrocks> or does it mean we will have a lot more at FF? :p
14:46 <cpaelzer> indeed
14:46 <sarnold> 22.04 was 'solid' things, and 22.10 is "lets get these new things going"
14:46 <cpaelzer> no, major shifts e.g. pipewire in desktop are causing half of them
14:46 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
14:46 <sarnold> none here
14:46 <didrocks> nothing from me
14:46 <slyon> none
14:46 <joalif> nothing
14:47 <cpaelzer> me neither
14:47 <cpaelzer> ok, that was a lot already
14:47 <cpaelzer> thank you all
14:47 <cpaelzer> see you next week and happy reviewing
14:47 <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :)
14:47 <slyon> thanks!
14:47 <didrocks> thanks cpaelzer, all!
14:47 <joalif> thanks all!
14:47 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting