14:30 <cpaelzer> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:30 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:30:23 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:30 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:30 <joalif> o/ 14:30 <cpaelzer> hiho sarnold didrocks slyon jamespage joalif 14:30 <cpaelzer> no previous actions to review 14:31 <slyon> heyhey! o/ 14:31 <cpaelzer> let us get to the lists, accorindg to my inbox there might be a lot today 14:31 <jamespage> o/ 14:31 <cpaelzer> #topic current component mismatches 14:31 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:31 <cpaelzer> licensecheck would usually be foundations, seems like one of the explosions we also sometimes see with lintian 14:32 <cpaelzer> slyon: is this known in foundations already? 14:32 <slyon> nothing new, IMO. jaraco.context needs to be looked at by openstack 14:32 <slyon> cpaelzer: yes. the MIR is already filed: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1972853 14:32 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1972853 in libxs-parse-sublike-perl (Ubuntu) "[MIR] lib*-perl" [Undecided, Confirmed] 14:32 <cpaelzer> yes, but last week jamespage wasn't around 14:32 <cpaelzer> he is now 14:32 <slyon> we did a combined MIR for all of those *-perl packages 14:32 <cpaelzer> jamespage: are you ok to take jaraco to your team? 14:32 <cpaelzer> slyon: great 14:33 <slyon> (actuall, Simon did, kudos!) 14:33 <cpaelzer> on requests -> python-charset-normalizer, that was picke dup by server already (and had some help from people on +1 duty) 14:33 <jamespage> cpaelzer: yep 14:33 <cpaelzer> slyon: did that also include the perl things dependet on by sphinx? 14:33 <slyon> Yes, we had olivier look into requests a bit, too. I think there was some exchange with the server team happening 14:33 <cpaelzer> yes - that is what i referred to 14:34 <slyon> cpaelzer: yes. it also includes the sphinx changes. they are all very similar 14:34 <cpaelzer> libsoup is driven by the desktop team already 14:34 <cpaelzer> libqrtr-glib as well 14:34 <cpaelzer> nothing super new that needs action here I think 14:34 <slyon> ACK 14:34 <didrocks> o/ 14:34 * cpaelzer feels good that teams are more on top of things nowadays! 14:34 <cpaelzer> #topic New MIRs 14:34 <cpaelzer> Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:35 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:35 <cpaelzer> yep that reflects what I meant with "seen many in my inbox" 14:35 <sarnold> wow 14:35 <cpaelzer> 13 to assign 14:36 <cpaelzer> of which 5 are hopefulyl-easy-perl cases 14:36 <jamespage> I can take that manila MIR - I've not been involved in that 14:36 <cpaelzer> didrocks: which of the desktop cases do you think benefit the most from you knowing Desktop better than the others? 14:36 <cpaelzer> thanks jamespage, assigning manila to you 14:36 <joalif> @cpaelzer https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfreeaptx/+bug/1971767 shouldn't be there, i've done the review and got an ack from security too 14:36 <jamespage> beat you to it :) 14:37 <didrocks> cpaelzer: I think wireplumber, libsoup3, gnome-console 14:37 <cpaelzer> indeed joalif let me set the status right 14:37 <cpaelzer> didrocks: would you take these then 14:37 <didrocks> happy to take the 3 of them, not commiting to them for next week though 14:37 <cpaelzer> then we can re-look at the list and look to assign the rest starting with me and slyon 14:37 <cpaelzer> not-next-week is ok didrocks as long as it is not 6 weeks 14:37 <slyon> yes. and joalif possibly? 14:38 <didrocks> definitively won’t be 6 14:38 * didrocks just won 3 new tabs 14:38 <slyon> haha 14:38 <sarnold> hehhe 14:38 <cpaelzer> ok updated the freeaptx case joalif 14:38 <joalif> thanks 14:39 <cpaelzer> the perl'y things are probably all similar 14:40 <cpaelzer> and in the past often got a fast pass not needing security,but one never knows 14:40 <slyon> they should be straight forward, yes 14:40 <cpaelzer> and it should be joalif or me 14:40 <cpaelzer> let me try 14:40 <cpaelzer> that leaves libldac libqtr-glib and ruby-webrick for joalif and slyon 14:40 <cpaelzer> could you pick those as you see fit? 14:40 <joalif> so what do I get ? 14:40 <slyon> I dont know any of those, so don't care 14:41 <slyon> I can take the first two I guess :) 14:41 <joalif> me neither 14:41 <slyon> libldac and libqtr-glib 14:41 <slyon> that'd leave ruby-webrick for joalif ? 14:41 <joalif> and libdac ? 14:41 <cpaelzer> I have all assigned now 14:41 <cpaelzer> as discussed 14:41 <cpaelzer> thank you all 14:42 <slyon> joalif: I'll take libldac, too 14:42 <cpaelzer> with so much inbound and plenty of PTO days coming (christian central europe Thu + often Fri) and Memorial day in US we should try to be fast, but might not make all of them by next week 14:42 <cpaelzer> just to set expectations for anyone watching, these might take a bit more 14:42 <didrocks> just refreshing the page… feeling better 14:42 <sarnold> \o/ 14:42 <cpaelzer> let us say 2 weeks :-) 14:43 <cpaelzer> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:43 <cpaelzer> Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:43 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:43 <sarnold> amurray finished libfreeaptx while I was asleep (distributed companies are neat :) and telegraf is in-progress, but this week is my cve triage week, so less progress there than one might wish 14:43 <sarnold> oh sigh I jumped the gun didn't it 14:43 <cpaelzer> you did 14:43 <cpaelzer> none of the incompletes needs our acation 14:43 <cpaelzer> one is from last weeks meeting 14:43 <cpaelzer> and the other was just a tracking change 14:44 <cpaelzer> #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:44 <cpaelzer> Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:44 <cpaelzer> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:44 <cpaelzer> see above :-) 14:44 <cpaelzer> seen freeaptx and glad to hear that telegraf is ongoing 14:44 <cpaelzer> sergiodj: ^^ FYI 14:44 <cpaelzer> sarnold: given the peak on the MIR queue today you can let the team know that quite likely a similar sized peak will hit your queue 14:45 <sarnold> *nod* 14:45 <cpaelzer> not all might need a security review 14:45 <cpaelzer> but relatively, there should be some 14:45 <sarnold> now would be a good time to ask if anyone would like a change of pace :) 14:45 <cpaelzer> TBH you (=security team) asked to get things early and we have seen many teams do so 14:45 <cpaelzer> so we should feel good about this 14:45 <sarnold> I do! 14:46 <didrocks> indeed, we are still far from FF 14:46 <cpaelzer> thanks on security then 14:46 <sarnold> it really does feel like things are clipping along nicely 14:46 <didrocks> or does it mean we will have a lot more at FF? :p 14:46 <cpaelzer> indeed 14:46 <sarnold> 22.04 was 'solid' things, and 22.10 is "lets get these new things going" 14:46 <cpaelzer> no, major shifts e.g. pipewire in desktop are causing half of them 14:46 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business? 14:46 <sarnold> none here 14:46 <didrocks> nothing from me 14:46 <slyon> none 14:46 <joalif> nothing 14:47 <cpaelzer> me neither 14:47 <cpaelzer> ok, that was a lot already 14:47 <cpaelzer> thank you all 14:47 <cpaelzer> see you next week and happy reviewing 14:47 <sarnold> thanks cpaelzer, all :) 14:47 <slyon> thanks! 14:47 <didrocks> thanks cpaelzer, all! 14:47 <joalif> thanks all! 14:47 <cpaelzer> #endmeeting