== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by cpaelzer, 17 May at 14:34 — 14:59 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-05-17-14.34.log.html == Meeting summary == === Review of previous action items === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:34. === current component mismatches === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:35. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (cpaelzer, 14:35) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (cpaelzer, 14:35) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:44. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:44) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwpe/+bug/1973031 (cpaelzer, 14:45) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpebackend-fdo/+bug/1973033 (cpaelzer, 14:45) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:46. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:46) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-invoke/+bug/1892875 (cpaelzer, 14:48) === MIR related Security Review Queue === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:49. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 14:49) === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 14:52. == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (77) * slyon (18) * didrocks (12) * sarnold (7) * ubottu (5) * meetingology (2) * joalif (1) == Full log == 14:34 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:34 Meeting started at 14:34:30 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 14:34 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 14:34 hi sarnold joalif slyon didrocks jamespage 14:34 o/ 14:34 #topic Review of previous action items 14:35 only action is me wanting to thank you all to carry this on while I was sick and on sprint! 14:35 #topic current component mismatches 14:35 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:35 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:35 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:35 new cycle, new mismatches showing up 14:35 ahve you talked about pipewire->libldac before? 14:35 nope, seems new 14:36 didrocks: seb128: that seems desktop'ish - would you talk to the team if one can check this new dependency? 14:37 hmm didrocks might be unavailable 14:37 I have pinged internally, maybe one joins - let us identify more new cases 14:38 ruby-xmlrpc -> ruby->webrick is new to me 14:38 did you check that last week? 14:38 ruby-xmlrpc looks new 14:38 ah... I think we might have left that for you :P 14:39 fine and fair 14:39 I'll talk with kanashiro later 14:39 thanks 14:40 jaraco.text 14:40 that is from the openstack context 14:40 jamespage: ? ^^ 14:40 we pinged him in the past about it, but he might not yet have had the time to check 14:41 plenty of others have stubs - which is great as that defines an owner 14:41 yes, many are in the foundations backlog 14:42 requests (python) -> python-charset-normalizer 14:42 cpaelzer: sorry, meeting running over 14:42 that is also server sadly, I do not know why this one pytohn lib is ours, but we will have a look 14:42 yeah, will do pipewire 14:42 np, welcome didrocks 14:42 and thanks for that 14:42 (still in meeting btw) 14:42 I'll take requests for the server team 14:42 thanks! 14:44 all others have stubs or are known false positives 14:44 going on ... 14:44 #topic New MIRs 14:44 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 14:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:45 desktop is flooding us :-) 14:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwpe/+bug/1973031 14:45 Launchpad bug 1973031 in libwpe (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libwpe" [High, New] 14:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpebackend-fdo/+bug/1973033 14:45 yeah :p 14:45 Launchpad bug 1973033 in wpebackend-fdo (Ubuntu) "[MIR] wpebackend-fdo" [High, New] 14:45 both looking for volunteers 14:45 I can probably take one of them 14:45 I could do the lib 14:46 would you didrocks do the -fdo one? 14:46 ack, I will do the -fdo 14:46 assigned both 14:46 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:46 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 14:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:47 ok we have a few recent updates ... 14:47 iwd and g-t-e is waiting on desktop 14:47 vulkan and smartcards are just tracking updates 14:47 and yet to what didrocks said 14:47 btw in that context I reviewed "ell" today, that is waiting on security now 14:47 \o/ 14:48 I'd like to consult the rest of the MIR team about iwd 14:48 see how happy sarnold is :p 14:48 let us do that in other business slyon 14:48 ack 14:48 completing this section with 14:48 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-invoke/+bug/1892875 14:48 Launchpad bug 1892875 in python-invoke (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-invoke" [Medium, Incomplete] 14:48 discussion going on betwen bdrung and jamespage - not really a discussion, but TL;DR no action needed atm 14:49 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 14:49 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 14:49 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:49 ell (just mentioned above) has a milestone set as seb mentioned when it is needed 14:50 I'm still waiting for a milestone on vulkan-tools, but I know people are waiting on this as well 14:50 sarnold: how does progress look on your side now? 14:50 this last week was some yak-shaving, getting new coverity, new coverity license, installed and working on my poor old build laptop; a bug report I filed on the segfault during build was very well received :D 14:50 tracking in place, people/resources available ? 14:50 cpaelzer: it feels much happier now, yes 14:51 ok, let me do my groundhog day - any news for telegraf then? 14:51 it is at the top of the list, so it is the one I ask about 14:51 a nice visit with an old friend :D https://github.com/influxdata/telegraf/issues/11092#issuecomment-1125404409 14:51 Issue 11092 in influxdata/telegraf "Unchecked net.Listen() causes segfault in instrumental test" [Closed] 14:51 hehe 14:52 I think that's it for us 14:52 that sounds like "ongoing" then 14:52 thanks 14:52 #topic Any other business? 14:52 iwd from slyon? 14:52 bug 1971739 14:52 Bug 1971739 in iwd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] iwd" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1971739 14:52 the question is: should we require security review? 14:52 reading through it ... 14:53 iwd runs a daemon/service as root, but it has very good isolation/security in place in its systemd .service unit 14:53 * didrocks reads too 14:53 I'd still vote for getting a review 14:53 what is the policy, we apply here? Usually, daemon as root => security review. But IMO that was before systemd-service isolation existed 14:54 for me the question is not "is it well isolated" that is for the security team to decide. Instead it is "does this have an attack surface" -> if yes then need review 14:54 it is a simplification, but that is how I handle it most of the time 14:54 yeah, me too 14:54 I'm not putting all my eggs into the "systemd will keep me safe and warm" basket 14:54 ack. I might have some bias there :D 14:54 heh :) 14:54 I will be requiring security-review then 14:54 to be clear I appreciate every isolation that is used and it makes the feeling better and more likely to pass review 14:55 but it still needs one 14:55 this will follow the same deadline as ell then, setting milestone 14:55 yes 14:56 I updated the case 14:57 anything else for "other business" ? 14:57 nothing from me 14:57 nothing for me 14:57 nothign 14:57 nothing 14:58 neither from me 14:58 to close this - just as expected "new cycle new fun" 14:58 thank you all! 14:59 thanks cpaelzer, all :) 14:59 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)