== Meeting information == * #ubuntu-meeting: Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status meeting, started by cpaelzer, 01 Feb at 15:30 — 15:57 UTC. * Full logs at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2022/ubuntu-meeting.2022-02-01-15.30.log.html == Meeting summary == === Review of previous action items === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:30. === current component mismatches === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:32. * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg (cpaelzer, 15:32) * ''LINK:'' https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg (cpaelzer, 15:32) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:39. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1893935 (cpaelzer, 15:40) * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twitter-bootstrap3/+bug/1667150 (cpaelzer, 15:40) === New MIRs === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:41. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:42) === Incomplete bugs / questions === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:49. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:49) === MIR related Security Review Queue === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:52. * ''LINK:'' https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir (cpaelzer, 15:52) === Any other business? === Discussion started by cpaelzer at 15:56. == People present (lines said) == * cpaelzer (94) * slyon (15) * sarnold (10) * didrocks (9) * joalif (4) * jamespage (4) * ubottu (3) * meetingology (2) == Full log == 15:30 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 15:30 Meeting started at 15:30:22 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology 15:30 Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick 15:30 ping slyon, didrocks, sarnold, joalif, jamespage for MIR meeting 15:30 hey 15:30 o/ 15:30 o/ 15:30 #topic Review of previous action items 15:30 last week we landed a few wiki updates (done) 15:30 adn we assigned a few MIR reviews 15:31 I've just seen didrocks complete his a few hours ago 15:31 and I did mine last wednesday 15:31 *many* hours ago, hem hem :) 15:31 o/ 15:31 IIRC there was one more for joalif with guidance by jamespage if needed - did that complete as well? 15:31 I'm working on mine, i'm about to finish it 15:31 I completed mine as well (set to incomplete) 15:31 and we had something I forgot assigned to slyon, maybe not a review - /me checks logs 15:31 ah ok 15:31 great then 15:31 so notihng toally stuck and forgotten 15:32 great 15:32 let us look at this weeks news then 15:32 #topic current component mismatches 15:32 good morning 15:32 Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams 15:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 15:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 15:32 non-proposed looks like all-known 15:33 libreoffice-epiphany sounds familiar, but not of recently 15:33 didrocks: thinse LO is desktop, do you remember? 15:33 s/thinse/since/ 15:34 I don’t remember we had it on the list, I’ll look at it 15:34 wanted to write "that" and changed my mind to 2since" => thinse :-) 15:34 thanks for having a look 15:34 the rest is mostly known 15:34 mesa/postgresql-14 -> llvm-toolchain-13 really "just" waits for promotion of llvm-toolchain-13 15:34 ack 15:34 mclemenceau: has asked doko to have a look 15:35 but nothing happened for quite a while, probably busy by many other things 15:35 slyon: do you know if doko is available enough these days to rely on him, or should we make his life easier asking another AA to promote it? 15:36 he is only available a few days a week, so if it just needs promotion, we might need another AA to move it forward quicker 15:36 s/might need/might ask/ 15:36 foundations agrees to own it and IIRC they subscribed 15:36 let me check 15:37 yes we agreed to own LLVM. but apparently the llvm-toolchain-13 package is not yet subscribed :-/ 15:37 foundations-bugs is not yet subscribed AFAICS 15:37 so not "just promoting it" 15:38 let me check back with doko then during our next team meeting 15:38 you already do the work and maintenance, we just need to correct the subscription and then promote it 15:38 no need for a complex case, but it would unblock a lot of rather complex things in -proposed 15:38 so I'd like to give this a +1 in prio 15:38 thanks slyon for carrying it to the team 15:39 doesn't have to be doko to handle it AFAICT 15:39 ok, enough of mismatches for today 15:39 #topic New MIRs 15:39 python-vitrage? 15:39 sarnold: while new it has a bug assigned per the color 15:39 I'll take that its openstack related 15:39 thanks jamespage 15:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1893935 15:40 Launchpad bug 1893935 in python-vitrageclient (Ubuntu Jammy) "[MIR] python3-vitrageclient" [High, Triaged] 15:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twitter-bootstrap3/+bug/1667150 15:40 Launchpad bug 1667150 in twitter-bootstrap3 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] twitter-bootstrap3" [High, Won't Fix] 15:40 that was marked wontfix in 2019.. 15:40 comment #9 suggests the JS is just for docs 15:40 the latter can be painful doing much more than needed in one package and having plenty of dependencies (from my look at it for mailman3 back in the day) 15:40 I don't know how we mark those 15:40 it will be 15:40 so be careful when reviewing those jamespage 15:41 maybe you can cut twitter-bootstrap3 and only need the python-vitrageclient 15:41 should be much easier overall 15:41 ack 15:41 ok, trying again to go on with the agenda :-) Thanks for bringing it up though - was worth the discussion 15:41 #topic New MIRs 15:42 Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing 15:42 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:42 "only one bug" but a complex one and two tasks 15:42 step #1 - I'd suggest we do assign two people (one per task) to split the load 15:42 anyone feeling less than 1255 busy these days that could have a look? 15:42 125% 15:43 I am 214% this week (approximately), but if this can wait another week, I’m happy reviewing something like cargo 15:43 well, by some definition of "happy" :) 15:44 there are quite some "TODO" left open in the bug description 15:44 are we sure this is even meant to be ready for review? 15:44 same for me, however I am happy to review whatever (right now I cannot judge the complexity of a review ) 15:45 I've been told its ready. I think the mwhudson opinion has been clarified in the comments and an autopkgtest has been proposed in Debian 15:45 ok 15:45 I do not really see the time either, but since I'm involved in drafting the rust rules I'll take rustc 15:45 agreed that description should be updated first to address/remove TODOs 15:45 but for cargo at least I'd want someone else to do it 15:46 hmm, he mentions devendoring llvm.. I thought the rust folks had pretty significant changes in their llvm 15:46 schopin: could you carry https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cargo/+bug/1957932/comments/1 into an update of the bug description please? 15:46 Launchpad bug 1957932 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rustc, cargo" [Critical, New] 15:48 I think for rustc I'm gonna do a first level reivew asking for detailed plans on llvm but also things like dh-cargo and others that came up while drafting the MIR rules for it 15:48 looking for a cargo volunteer 15:49 If no one says yes it will be didrocks with the acknowledgement to do it next week and a big credit for next "looking for volunteers" round :-) 15:49 hehe 15:49 ok that will be it 15:49 (beers in Franfurt :p) 15:49 we have to get through our content to not miss other bits ... 15:49 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 15:49 Mission: discuss the recent activity to identify any follow up action 15:49 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:50 I have pinged ahasenack on FRR, thanks didrocks for the review 15:50 yw! 15:50 Since it was a security-team request to please change quagga->frr I hope we can still get a fast-pass on an security ack 15:51 the other things you asked on the bug seem fine and ahasenack is great at resolving those 15:51 everything else is older 15:51 v4l2-relayd 15:51 that one is back to the reporter 15:52 oh I see, long list of todos 15:52 thanks 15:52 I assembled a list of TODOs that needs improvement 15:52 #topic MIR related Security Review Queue 15:52 Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? 15:52 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 15:52 sarnold: any news that will raise our mood on this? 15:53 only slightly, python-cheroot is still in progress, no progress on adsys 15:53 I see foundations and Desktop have updated their deadlines/milestones 15:53 \o/ 15:53 10 Packages (+FRR/libyang2 that we know of + potentially a bit more over the next few weeks) 15:53 having these milestones, and the launchpad config to see them :), is pretty fantastic 15:54 yeah... the Rust/Cargo MIR is one of them.. 15:54 (once assigned to security) 15:54 if we look at feature freeze or even beta that means from now on we will need like 3-4 per week done to go on 15:54 just to size the focus and priority correctly 15:54 @sarnold 15:55 well, I *was* feeling optimstic.. 15:55 or you shut down security for a week at the last possible time and all do just reviews - but then no time is left, so no findings allowed :-) 15:56 Please be optimistic, but I just wanted to make clear what velocity you need to get it done - so you can scream for more people in the team meetings that you have 15:56 and by that we get to 15:56 #topic Any other business? 15:56 nothing from me 15:56 nothing from me 15:56 nothing 15:56 nothing either 15:56 nothing here 15:57 ok then, closing for today ... just in time 15:57 thank you all 15:57 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.4.0 (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)