14:36 <doko> #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status
14:36 <meetingology> Meeting started at 14:36:44 UTC.  The chair is doko.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology
14:36 <meetingology> Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick
14:36 <doko> #topic Review of previous action items
14:37 <doko> we didn't have the meeting at all last week, so skipping
14:37 <doko> #topic current component mismatches
14:37 <doko> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg
14:37 <doko> #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg
14:38 * sarnold gives his customary weekly ack to cpaelzer about backuppc
14:38 <doko> sarnold, status of backupppc related security reviews?
14:38 <sarnold> I don't remember seeing the libayatana-appindacator thing
14:38 <sarnold> doko: not yet started
14:39 <doko> ayatana looks incomplete, 2/3 packages done. maybe ping didrocks?
14:39 <doko> jamespage, can you review the cherrypy related ones, or should we split these?
14:40 <doko> mesa is still pending. I email didrocks two weeks ago. no reply yet
14:41 <cpaelzer> I'm around - sorry
14:41 <doko> ipmitool is oldish, but shows up in mismatches ... waiting on cpaelzer for that
14:41 <cpaelzer> thanks for backuppc @sarnold
14:42 <cpaelzer> IIRC ipmitool is from MAAS for MAAS
14:42 <cpaelzer> and no one ever cared about it
14:42 <cpaelzer> [Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Impish supported-maas seed]
14:42 <cpaelzer> yes
14:42 <doko> jamespage, fence-agents has been in main before. is it supposed to re-enter?
14:42 <cpaelzer> fence-agents comes from us I guess doko
14:42 <cpaelzer> as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004
14:42 <sarnold> yeah, we've had a discussion on the bug about the right names to use for the binary package that'll have agents we want to support
14:42 <cpaelzer> waiting for security atm
14:43 <doko> if we don't care about ipmitool, then maybe it should be seeded in the community-maas seed
14:43 <doko> who can confirm this?
14:44 <cpaelzer> Adam I guess
14:45 <cpaelzer> Collard
14:45 <cpaelzer> I hope that wasn't misspelled ...
14:45 <doko> I'll chase this with xnox
14:45 <doko> I think he set these seeds initially
14:46 <cpaelzer> freeipmi is in main, ipmitool and openimpi are not
14:46 <cpaelzer> unfortunately HW manaufacturers seem to be unable to settle on one
14:46 <sarnold> heh I didn't realize we had three of the things
14:46 <cpaelzer> we might end up taking it in in additon to the one we have, but these changes
14:47 <cpaelzer> seed changes I mean
14:47 <cpaelzer> that it is worth to start with a clarification
14:48 <sarnold> hmm, openimpi also looks to be in main
14:48 <cpaelzer> sarnold: oh your are right, agreed
14:49 <cpaelzer> so maybe we really have to take the third one in to make it a charm :-)
14:49 <sarnold> hah
14:49 <sarnold> or is it 'operator' now..
14:49 <cpaelzer> other than the expected fight of who will own this I see no problem
14:49 <cpaelzer> and starting with xnox to calrify the intend doesn't sound like a bad start
14:50 <cpaelzer> thanks doko for offering to chase this down
14:52 <doko> I don't want to create actions for people not being present ... didn't work well last time
14:52 <cpaelzer> hehe
14:52 <cpaelzer> FYI I have reviewed prips which came in yesterday
14:53 <cpaelzer> and I have updated the status on a few to get them moving forward
14:53 <cpaelzer> but nothing that would be a new team todo
14:53 <doko> #topic New MIRs
14:53 <cpaelzer> shall we look at th ebug lists now?
14:53 <doko> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
14:54 <cpaelzer> That scary list is actually two
14:54 <cpaelzer> let us start with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libftdi1/+bug/1912371
14:54 <sarnold> oh hey and one of them is even good news :)
14:54 <cpaelzer> doko: in the update between commend 8 and 9
14:55 <cpaelzer> doko: did you have a look and acked it assinging it to security?
14:55 <cpaelzer> that wasn't clear to me looking at the bug this morning
14:55 <cpaelzer> if you have, then this is ready to go
14:55 <cpaelzer> if it was a mistake then we need to assign someoen for a MIR review
14:56 <cpaelzer> essentially William self-reviewed in commen 8 :-)
14:56 <sarnold> what's the libftdi and libftdi1 change amurray made in comment 16?
14:56 <cpaelzer> so your update could be seen as sign-off and Ack on that
14:56 <doko> ok, I'll chase this down as well, probably just needs a seed
14:56 <cpaelzer> sarnold: If I read correctly there is a debdiff that shall be applöied before promotion
14:57 <doko> yep, the symbols file should be fixed
14:58 <doko> I'll chase this down
14:58 <cpaelzer> thanks
14:58 <cpaelzer> let us go to the bigger chunks of work now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jaraco.classes/+bug/1930111
14:58 <cpaelzer> 8 potentially easy python lib review tasks to assign
14:58 <doko> yep, already asked before. should we split this, or load it on jamespage? ;)
14:59 <cpaelzer> but the question upfront, who will own this?
14:59 <cpaelzer> Is that from openstack?
14:59 <doko> yes, openstack
14:59 <cpaelzer> I'd say we assign him and he can call out to us if needed
15:00 <cpaelzer> as he knows how this works even if he has no time to do it himself
15:00 <cpaelzer> python3-cherrypy3                                         | cherrypy3                              | ceph-mgr                                          | Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>      |          228656 |            1181
15:00 <cpaelzer> from germinate so yes indeed from openstack
15:01 <cpaelzer> I've added an update and assigned jamespage to one of them
15:01 <cpaelzer> now it shoudl be clear
15:01 <cpaelzer> is that ok for everyone atm?
15:02 <sarnold> I'm slightly skeptical the world needs yet another "high performance python webserver", it feels like one of the other existing webservers ought to work..
15:02 <sarnold> but perhaps that's not one to solve at this meeting
15:03 <cpaelzer> I agree
15:03 <cpaelzer> to both
15:07 <cpaelzer> ok
15:07 <cpaelzer> next ...
15:07 <doko> #topic Incomplete bugs / questions
15:07 <doko> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir
15:08 <sarnold> hmm, "new cherrypy3 18.6.0-1 release" .. we've got 8.9.1-8 packaged now.. this might be a big jump, heh
15:08 <cpaelzer> or just a rename
15:08 <cpaelzer> versions are smoke and mirrors
15:08 <cpaelzer> I guess there is only https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledmon/+bug/1794219 in this list to talk about
15:09 <cpaelzer> doko: this one seems that sil2100 decided to help sorting that out
15:09 <cpaelzer> doko: does tha answer we got from rex tsai satisfy that for foundations to go on?
15:10 <doko> ok, I'll take this
15:11 <cpaelzer> thanks ++
15:11 <cpaelzer> #topic Any other business?
15:11 <cpaelzer> not from me
15:12 <sarnold> none from me
15:12 <doko> ok, finished!
15:12 <doko> #endmeeting