14:31 #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status 14:31 Meeting started Tue Jun 23 14:31:12 2020 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:31 14:31 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 14:31 ddstreet: jamespage: doko: didrocks: sarnold: joeubuntu: - hi 14:31 o/ 14:31 hi 14:31 o/ 14:31 did I miss anybody, I feel like I count one too few 14:31 anyway lets get started, you poitn out in case I missed someone 14:31 #topic Review of previous action items 14:32 o/ 14:32 no actions of last week, so - done 14:32 #topic current component mismatches 14:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg 14:32 #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg 14:32 Mostly usual suspects we know from last time - we still have: 14:32 - jeepney for jamespage 14:32 - uboot for waveform 14:32 One actual new entry rsync -> xxhash 14:32 Does anyone have context on this one? 14:32 It was in main in D&E, so it mist have been pre-MIRed right? 14:33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/teckit/+bug/1803230 14:33 Launchpad bug 1803230 in xxhash (Ubuntu) "[MIR] teckit & xxhash, new rdeps of texlive-bin" [High,Incomplete] 14:33 that included xxhash 14:34 (hey) 14:34 didrocks: is desktop still subscribed and if so are you ok re-promoting it under the old bug? 14:34 cpaelzer: I can pass the message on, but being on holidays in a couple of hours, I can’t sign up for tracking 14:35 but apparently would need a new subscriber 14:35 or another 14:35 IIRC there has been some discussions about the whole tex stack 14:35 like, not being very desktopish 14:35 or the newly added dependency in rsync has to be dropped 14:36 yeah 14:36 didrocks: as a suggestion, would you mind passing this on to the desktop team so that next week someone else is here to answer if you would take it (again) or not? 14:36 cpaelzer: sure, doing it 14:36 ok - from there we can go on then 14:36 thanks 14:36 cpaelzer: the better solution is to subscribe server or foundations to it 14:37 good morning 14:37 doko: if we want to keep it in I agree, but more often than not in such cases it end up no team wanting to own it 14:37 doko: but if you ask around and next week know if "you'd take it if desktop passes" then that would be ok as well 14:39 doko: we can sort out next week who of us will take a look after the desktop team is back with a clear answer on their state of it 14:39 #topic New MIRs 14:39 this week we have a few 14:39 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:39 jeepney is known and in process by security 14:40 totally new we seem to have 14:40 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinih/+bug/1883890 14:40 Launchpad bug 1883890 in libinih (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libinih" [Undecided,New] 14:40 a lib for "not invented here" nice 14:41 :) 14:41 further we have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjcat/+bug/1884003 14:41 Launchpad bug 1884003 in libjcat (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libjcat" [Undecided,New] 14:41 a security lib for fwupd 14:41 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-teluguvijayam/+bug/1877134 14:41 Launchpad bug 1877134 in fonts-teluguvijayam (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fonts-teluguvijayam" [Undecided,New] 14:41 those three need to be assigned 14:41 I at least have a friedn speaking telugu in case we need to check the real font 14:41 so I'd volunteer for the last one 14:42 others for nig and jcat ? 14:42 nih and jcat 14:42 3/3 fonts packages I looked at in the past where very awkward - I hop ethis one is better 14:43 i can volunteer for one of them 14:43 cpaelzer, note that the font got promoted already so I was unsure if the MIR was needed but I still filed it 14:44 oh really, maybe it was MIRed in the past already then 14:44 fonts-teluguvijayam | 1.0-3 | groovy | source, all 14:44 indeed seb128 14:44 thanks 14:44 the 'libinih' name will probably confuse people, since upstart used 'libnih' which i believe is a totally different lib 14:44 I haven't done a mir from the side of the mir team yet; libjcat feels likely to be a good, small, starting point 14:44 it is INI parsing 14:45 sarnold: if you want that would be great, otherwise I'll do it as my fonts package just got cancelled 14:45 ddstreet: jcat for you then 14:45 sarnold: and you let me know if you run into any trouble 14:45 sounds good :) 14:46 assigned 14:46 #topic Incomplete bugs / questions 14:46 cpaelzer, no, it was not MIRed in the past 14:46 Last update on incomplete bugs was on 2020-05-12, no need to bring this subtopic up in more detail 14:46 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir 14:46 oh - interesting seb128 14:46 lets continue that in the next topic then 14:46 which is ... 14:46 #topic Any other business? 14:46 doko: do we have any tracking who promoted something and why? 14:47 from the archive admin POV I mean? 14:47 seb128: ^^ ? 14:47 I think everyone can see this, no? 14:47 cpaelzer, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-teluguvijayam/+publishinghistory 14:47 in the publishing hist 14:47 cpaelzer: see the publishing history 14:47 vorlon did it 14:47 but no reason recorded there though 14:47 so best to check with Steve 14:48 well let me do the review then and either retrofit the Ack - or mention in case I don't agree 14:48 right 14:48 it made me wodner if there was an unstated policy that fonts don't need a MIR anymore 14:48 would be nice :) 14:48 ok, this is on my plate to sort out then 14:49 vorlon: ^^ in case you see this feel free to contact me as well if you have bonus info :-) 14:49 we done with the meeting then, unless there is "other other business" 14:49 is there ? 14:49 ok we count out to 42 todady with Catalan numbers 14:50 1 14:50 1 14:50 2 14:50 5 14:50 14 14:50 42 14:50 ok thanks everyone 14:50 nice, thanks cpaelzer, all :) 14:50 #endmeeting