14:59 #startmeeting DMB meeting 14:59 Meeting started Mon Feb 10 14:59:58 2020 UTC. The chair is slashd. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:59 14:59 Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 15:00 #topic Review of previous action items 15:00 #subtopic slashd handsome_feng Email interview 15:00 rbasak's endorsement re-validation request seemed to have been answers by most (if not by all) endorser. Currently pending on cyphermox and rbasak's votes. 15:00 tsimonq2 hasn't replied yet 15:01 I will vote today 15:01 rbasak, ok so you prefer to wait for tsimonq2 re-endorsement ? 15:01 I had been waiting. 15:01 rbasak, all good 15:01 I guess I can continue without, if he doesn't get back to us. 15:02 Let's give people some reasonable amount of time to respond. 15:02 Say a week? I'm not sure how long it's been. 15:02 I'd also like to update the application process page to avoid this situation occurring again. 15:02 Which I intend to JFDI, if people are fine with that. 15:02 JFDI ? 15:03 I'm bad with acronym 15:03 Just ... and Do It. 15:03 gotcha 15:03 rbasak, ok let's give it til friday then ? 15:03 Well, with no and. 15:03 My vote for handsome_feng is still valid if anything 15:04 Yes, OK. 15:04 rbasak, good thanks 15:04 #subtopic re-election 15:04 anything to add on this ? 15:04 The nomination period ends soon 15:04 I would like more nominations 15:05 Please be self-nominating 15:05 if you are a coredev or MOTU ^ 15:06 I guess that's all we had in term of items to discussed, unless someone have something to add, we have 1 applicant today, Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski). He is applying for the SRU Developer application. 15:06 dgadomski, can you introduce yourself ? 15:07 sure 15:07 wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dgadomski/UbuntuSRUDeveloperApplication 15:07 Hi. I'm Dariusz. I work for Canonical. I am a member of the Sustaining Engineering team where I mainly work on bugs reported by Ubuntu Advantage customers. I'm applying for SRU developer. 15:07 Do you guys have question for Dariusz ? 15:09 I do not 15:09 dgadomski: how do you find the SRU process? Is there anything you would change? 15:11 rbasak: I have seen it working well for years, I haven't noticed problems with the process itself, I'm not sure how that would fit in the process but maybe extending the number of people testing -proposed would bring an improvement 15:12 OK, thanks! 15:12 I have no more questions. 15:13 dgadomski: I have one question: 15:13 I don't have question for Dariusz. 15:15 dgadomski: actually... looking at the upload history I already got my answer! Nevermind then ;) 15:15 No questions from me 15:16 sil2100, lol 15:16 seems like we are done with questions 15:16 let's vote 15:16 #vote Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer 15:16 Please vote on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer 15:16 Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname) 15:16 #voterequired 4 15:17 (wanted to ask about SRU requirements re: devel work, but then again I see the applicant already demonstrates the required knowledge) 15:17 ;) 15:17 sil2100, and it's a sru developer application, we don't expect much devel work w/ that application 15:18 Yeah, but it's important to know what the stage of the package should be in devel for a fix to be SRUed 15:18 right 15:18 +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team. 15:18 +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team. received from slashd 15:19 +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors 15:19 +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors received from rbasak 15:20 +1 15:20 +1 received from cyphermox 15:20 FWIW, SRUs to three packages in the past year is on the lower boundary of what I'd accept though. 15:20 +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!) 15:20 +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!) received from sil2100 15:20 #endvote 15:20 Voting ended on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer 15:20 Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0 15:20 Motion carried 15:21 Congrats dgadomski ! 15:21 However everything I've seen looks diligently done - thank you! 15:21 congrats dgadomski \o/ :) 15:21 congrats dgadomski! 15:21 thank you :) 15:22 dgadomski, congrats! o/ 15:22 Thanks everyone for joining the meeting, I guess we are done for today ! 15:22 #endmeeting