#title #ubuntu-meeting Meeting Meeting started by soren at 21:02:34 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2013/ubuntu-meeting.2013-01-07-21.02.log.html . == Meeting summary == ''LINK:'' https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/BrainstormReview/Dec2012 (pitti, 21:03:45) *Stuff from the mailing list. *Community bugs *AOB? ''ACTION:'' Next meeting (soren, 21:13:42) Meeting ended at 21:15:41 UTC. == Votes == == Action items == * Next meeting == People present (lines said) == * soren (39) * pitti (19) * cjwatson (7) * meetingology (4) * stgraber (2) == Full Log == 21:02:34 #startmeeting 21:02:34 Meeting started Mon Jan 7 21:02:34 2013 UTC. The chair is soren. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 21:02:34 21:02:34 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 21:02:52 I don't see any apologies on the ML. 21:03:07 So next item on the agenda is action items. 21:03:15 pitti: Brainstorm review? 21:03:33 my review resulted in 7 items, 3 of which got a response 21:03:37 the other four are still outstanding 21:03:45 [link] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoard/BrainstormReview/Dec2012 21:04:05 not very surprising with the holidays in between, etc. I asked for a response until mid-january 21:04:08 Sorry, one of those is mine 21:04:19 Still outstanding - plan is to simply fix the problem described 21:04:32 cjwatson: How radical. 21:05:02 * soren still trying to find the irc log from last meeting. 21:05:11 ...to find action items. 21:05:20 it's not a hard deadline anyway; I also didn't have a very formal way of strictly picking the top ten or so, I just grabbed the ones which seemed interesting and not already obsoleted by design 21:05:34 soren: there weren't any except the brainstorm review 21:05:37 soren: gotta happen occasionally 21:05:39 Cool. 21:06:06 pitti: Did you comment on the ones you intentionally skipped? 21:06:12 Saying that they're obsolete or whatever? 21:06:18 I didn't, no 21:06:42 Can we expire things from brainstorm? 21:06:45 many are about software-center, which is currently being rewritten the upteenth time 21:06:50 Or do their popularity decay over time? 21:07:07 if nobody votes them up any more, they decline, yes 21:07:19 I looked at "most popular in the last 6 months" 21:07:27 Ah, cool. 21:07:28 that said, even the most popular one wasn't very popular 21:07:45 it seems the whole thing is losing momentum 21:07:51 As long as they (probably) don't wind up beig the same ignored one next time we do the review, that's fine. 21:08:14 pitti: I'm sure one could draw number of conclusions from that fact. 21:08:22 nah, that's where the "subjective filter" comes into play :) 21:09:05 pitti: Right, right, I was just concerned we'd end up with the same stale ones at the top every time and we'd have to routinely start at item 37 before we got to anything that was still remotely current :) 21:09:18 no, that didn't seem to happen 21:09:21 Yay. 21:09:24 Ok, moving on. 21:09:41 Er.. 21:10:00 #topic Stuff from the mailing list. 21:10:03 that wasn't my experience in doing the review a while back, either 21:10:19 There's the MRE for sssd. 21:10:38 That was tjaalton's one, wasn't it? 21:10:46 Timo's reply is satisfactory enough; I'm minded to approve if nobody objects 21:10:58 (it only takes one) 21:11:04 If someone actively cares for it, I'm perfectly fine with it. 21:11:12 I have no strong opinion on that one TBH, as I don't know at all what that package does and how bad regressions would be 21:12:03 Anything else we've missed? 21:12:24 I don't think so. 21:12:46 #topic Community bugs 21:12:52 None. 21:13:00 #topic AOB? 21:13:07 nothing from me 21:13:34 3 21:13:35 2 21:13:36 1 21:13:38 Sold 21:13:42 #action Next meeting 21:13:42 * meetingology Next meeting 21:13:55 That'll be Jan 21st. 21:14:00 At 2100 UTC. 21:14:04 Who's chairing? 21:14:27 rotation would be stgraber 21:14:28 I can do it again. I probably owe a few times. 21:14:41 I'm fine with that 21:14:49 (as in, me doing it) 21:14:58 Thanks for clarifying :) 21:15:06 what happened to the "barely can fit that meeting in an hour, with heated discussion" times? :-) 21:15:30 (not that I miss them at that late hour) 21:15:36 thanks soren 21:15:41 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)