14:05:42 #startmeeting Developer Membership Board 14:05:42 Meeting started Mon Sep 24 14:05:42 2012 UTC. The chair is tumbleweed. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 14:05:42 14:05:42 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 14:05:53 #topic Review of previous action items 14:06:10 #subtopic laney to delete network-manager packageset 14:06:19 I assume that's blocked on my LP branch 14:06:47 yeah, that 14:06:55 how's that going 14:06:56 ? 14:07:01 nobody is reviewing it 14:07:20 naughty OCR? 14:07:29 tumbleweed: have you tried to get someone in #launchpad-dev to review it? 14:07:34 or nobody likes to touch soyuz? 14:07:42 the soyuz problem 14:08:39 nobody want's to touch the old Russian technology? ;) 14:08:51 rick_h punted to wgrant or SteveK, but neither of them have looked at i tyet 14:09:04 cjwatson: are you able to review LP MPs? ;-) 14:10:03 Laney: No 14:10:18 Laney: Nagging #launchpad-dev generally works for me 14:10:35 apparently there's some kind of fear factor 14:10:40 so it should be more targetted 14:10:42 * tumbleweed shall nag harder 14:10:48 it's a *trivial* patch 14:10:54 Laney: Like I say, it works for me for my extremely Soyuz-heavy MP distribution 14:11:01 Sure, the odd reviewer gives 14:11:02 up 14:11:15 But I've had plenty of reviewers other than William and Steve deal with my patches as well 14:11:23 I need feedback on style and deletion semantics more than anything else 14:11:42 anyway, that's blocking all the action items, that I can see 14:12:04 except 14:12:07 #subtopic stgraber to add ppu for lexical to fwts 14:12:16 done, according to the minutes 14:12:21 yep 14:12:30 so 14:12:33 #topic any other business 14:12:49 do we want to discuss libreoffice? 14:15:57 who will be at the UDS? 14:15:59 o/ for AOB 14:16:18 * tumbleweed will 14:16:31 * bdrung will be (thanks to being sponsored) 14:16:39 (yeah, that) 14:16:43 we actually won't have a meeting scheduled for UDS this time :) 14:16:45 everyone?! 14:16:55 that's sad :( 14:16:58 the UDS meetings are fun 14:17:00 I'll be there 14:17:02 we can still meet to plan though :) 14:17:13 do we want a meeting? 14:17:13 * xnox a bunch of rebels 14:17:31 #vote ban xnox 14:17:32 +1 14:17:45 :-) 14:17:51 * xnox told you so 14:17:54 +1 on UDS meetings being fun 14:18:00 * xnox probably will be banned now.... 14:18:24 tumbleweed: then let's schedule one 14:18:29 I'm sure we can arrange a special DMB meeting for any applicant at UDS :) 14:19:06 do we also want a private UDS meeting? 14:19:20 bdrung: prepared to organise it? 14:19:23 * micahg would actually prefer to keep the extra sessions to a minimum as UDS is only 4 days this time around (well, time permitting, sure, why not) 14:19:24 however, if we do, I'd prefer we don't have another meeting to discuss the DMB itself as UDS is a day shorter and I'm pretty sure my list of stuff to discuss won't be... 14:19:44 tumbleweed: i will be on vacation tomorrow 14:20:18 * stgraber is always happy to discuss DMB stuff over lunch though 14:20:22 well, what's more important to us then? 14:21:02 applicants? 14:21:50 I don't think we really have that many stuff to discuss outside of applicants. So I think we should schedule one public meeting. If we have applicants, we'll take them, if we don't, we'll discuss DMB stuff for an hour 14:22:07 works for me 14:22:20 me too 14:22:30 I suspect we'll be doing some hallway discussion on PPU issues 14:23:23 #action tumbleweed to schedule a DMB session at UDS 14:23:23 * meetingology tumbleweed to schedule a DMB session at UDS 14:23:31 micahg: you had something? 14:23:59 yeah 14:24:56 so, the issue came up last week that a docs team member couldn't upload docs for a derivative even thought the docs are owned by the docs team, I was wondering if we should be proactive here and create a docs packageset and invite people to apply for it 14:25:11 (someone with upload rights to ubuntu-docs already) 14:25:44 sounds good 14:26:37 well, in most cases flavours have a completely separate doc team from ~ubuntu-docs, so not having upload rights makes sense... 14:27:04 sudo sync 14:27:09 oops 14:27:11 https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-doc/ doesn't agree :) 14:27:50 if there are people who need this, I'd say invite the applicants, but no need to create the packageset until we have a member 14:28:22 +1 for tumbleweed's suggestion 14:28:29 tumbleweed: right, yeah, was thinking to discuss with the person in question and if desired have a formal application proposed 14:28:57 ok 14:29:43 * micahg guesses that's not what he originally said, but makes more sense 14:31:17 anything else? 14:31:36 no 14:31:42 next chair 14:31:59 stgraber: I guess 14:32:26 date of next meeting? 14:33:02 October, 8th according to our plan 14:33:05 Oct 8 is a legal holiday in US and CA 14:33:09 I won't be there on the 8th 14:33:14 * micahg neither 14:33:33 IIRC both barry and cody-somerville said they wouldn't either 14:33:40 tsk tsk - it's a public holiday here today (national braai day) 14:34:14 ok, so Oct 22nd 14:34:17 tumbleweed: yeah, the fact that it's a public holiday doesn't really matter to me, it's more the fact that I'll be coming back from a conference and preparing a trip to Europe ;) 14:34:30 i will be there on Oct. 8th 14:34:41 * tumbleweed can make the 8th 14:34:43 can't we just have it on the 15th? 14:35:04 and then another meeting on the 22nd? 14:35:07 no 14:35:17 push off a week so we can have one at UDS ;) 14:35:23 (that was a question) 14:35:24 a happy ending for all 14:35:25 i should be able to attend on the 15th 14:35:33 just shift by a week 14:36:00 as long as we don't clash with the techboard 14:36:04 15th would work, though I'd appreciate if we can shift it back post-UDS as otherwise we risk getting in conflicts with the TB meeting 14:36:24 silly TB 14:36:31 well, the meetings are only supposed to be 1 hr 14:36:41 (oh, and I also kinda like "working" on Mondays so if I can avoid having 2 hours worth of IRC meetings on the same day, that'd be nice ;)) 14:37:00 * micahg already has that :) 14:37:34 yeah, I have that on Wednesdays, so not looking forward to having more of that ;) 14:37:53 15th, UDS, back to the normal schedule? 14:38:00 * bdrung agrees 14:38:06 sounds good 14:38:09 done 14:38:23 #endmeeting