#title #ubuntu-meeting: weekly MOTU meeting Meeting started by tumbleweed at 16:09:16 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-09-06-16.09.log.html . == Meeting summary == *review of previous action items ''LINK:'' https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2012-08-23 (tumbleweed, 16:10:13) *Killing off sqlite 2 (src:sqlite) *Update from DeveloperAdvisoryTeam *Killing off sqlite 2 (src:sqlite) ''ACTION:'' xnox to speak to the debian gpe maintainers about dropping it (it depends on sqlite) (tumbleweed, 16:20:08) *Review UbuntuDevelopment/BugFixingInitiative *any other business? Meeting ended at 16:26:25 UTC. == Votes == == Action items == * xnox to speak to the debian gpe maintainers about dropping it (it depends on sqlite) == Action items, by person == * xnox ** xnox to speak to the debian gpe maintainers about dropping it (it depends on sqlite) == People present (lines said) == * tumbleweed (28) * dholbach (13) * xnox (10) * micahg (8) * coolbhavi (6) * meetingology (4) == Full Log == 16:09:16 #startmeeting weekly MOTU meeting 16:09:16 Meeting started Thu Sep 6 16:09:16 2012 UTC. The chair is tumbleweed. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 16:09:16 16:09:16 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 16:09:28 Agenda: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings 16:09:40 tumbleweed, I missed the previous meeting though I have news from DAT side 16:10:08 #topic review of previous action items 16:10:13 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2012-08-23 16:10:43 hrm, there were none 16:11:00 #topic Killing off sqlite 2 (src:sqlite) 16:11:00 yes 16:11:03 micahg: around? 16:12:30 oh, well, if he turns up... 16:12:49 #topic Update from DeveloperAdvisoryTeam 16:12:53 coolbhavi? 16:13:37 o/ 16:14:25 we can come back to that, after this 16:14:31 I'm here too :) 16:14:47 not many news from the DAT, business as usual :) 16:14:57 yep tumbleweed there was one of action items this UDS to give a session on DAT this UOW/UDW I took a session this UDW reg the same logs are here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1208/DevAdvisoryTeam 16:15:18 apart from that no other news 16:15:22 ah yes, good job coolbhavi 16:15:24 thanks 16:15:39 #topic Killing off sqlite 2 (src:sqlite) 16:15:47 micahg: all yours 16:15:48 nothing new yet 16:16:13 well, xnox fixed the tracker a little more to get us down to ~25 packages 16:16:29 that sounds doable, with some effort 16:16:46 there are decisions to be made. There is the whole stack for working with Palm phones (original Palm) 16:16:54 if we drop that, porting the rest should be easy 16:17:00 yeah, I probably won't be able to do much with it until the end of the month though, so if someone else wans to, feel free 16:17:04 was it like half of those 25 packages? 16:17:13 xnox: have you spoken with Debian at all? 16:17:24 micahg: that is the next action to do 16:18:56 xnox: you taking an action for that? 16:19:08 sure =) 16:19:33 what's the plam stack called? 16:19:47 gpe* 16:20:08 #action xnox to speak to the debian gpe maintainers about dropping it (it depends on sqlite) 16:20:08 * meetingology xnox to speak to the debian gpe maintainers about dropping it (it depends on sqlite) 16:20:24 moving on 16:20:31 #topic Review UbuntuDevelopment/BugFixingInitiative 16:20:53 I had a chat with a couple of people in #ubuntu-devel and wrote about it to the mailing list 16:20:54 anything this week? I think not? 16:21:04 oh, yes saw that 16:21:07 there were concerns that some fixes would better be sent to Debian 16:21:08 yeah. 16:21:21 I added fontfixing & seems like some/most have been sponsored now. 16:21:24 and also that the sponsoring queue might fill up with trivial fixes, which I feel is a lesser issue 16:21:26 thanks xnox! 16:21:39 Do we need to check remaining $font packages to see if they are ok or not? 16:21:50 I wrote an article for the packaging guide to make it easier to make a decision where a specific bug fix should go 16:22:01 have we seen a reasonable influx since UDW? 16:22:07 xnox: well, someone should probably :), perhaps an archive scan? 16:22:12 I hope that will help solve the issue of debian fixes going to ubuntu 16:22:21 I've certainly noticed some trivial things in the queue that could have come from UDW 16:22:38 tumbleweed, yes - there's a lot of interest - next week I hope to start hangout sessions, etc to help get more people involved 16:22:45 micahg: meh. Grep Contents, install it and either run font-config over them & launch some app =) 16:23:27 xnox: is the problem only visible at run time, or should a regex detect it? (think lintian lab scan) 16:24:00 that's all I have for now 16:24:25 that's all we have on the agenda 16:24:30 #topic any other business? 16:25:01 not from me 16:25:08 dholbach, timings of the hangout please? I'd love to join :) 16:25:20 coolbhavi, not sure yet, but I'll let you know :) 16:25:21 micahg: lintian can, not sure if it already does. 16:25:32 dholbach, sure thanks! 16:26:19 ok, let's wind this up 16:26:25 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology)