21:04:37 #startmeeting 21:04:37 Meeting started Fri Jun 29 21:04:37 2012 UTC. The chair is ajmitch. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. 21:04:37 21:04:37 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 21:05:05 OK, arb agenda is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppReviewBoard/Agenda 21:05:09 * stgraber waves 21:05:17 * highvoltage splashes 21:06:28 was looking over http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2012/ubuntu-meeting.2012-05-25-21.09.log.html from the last meeting, there weren't any actions added aside from the UDS items 21:07:34 * wendar waves 21:07:46 yay, people :) 21:08:23 I'm really tired so sorry for my lack of enthusiasm :) 21:08:25 do we want to quickly go over the developer portal bugs, or just be happy that they're there & being looked at? :) 21:09:01 * ajmitch mostly wants to get people voting on submissions, fwiw :) 21:09:49 Ok, I'll catch up with the votes tomorrow. And also all the nice things dolbach has been talking about. 21:10:12 yeah, I've been talking with dholbach a bit & following what he's been doing with the apps branch & arb-lint 21:10:13 and also try to get some sense of how many competition apps there are and what I can do about it 21:10:27 apparantly there are 30+ for the competition 21:10:45 I expect some won't be packaged for /opt/extras.ubuntu.com 21:11:38 this sort of covers some of the UDS workitems, with the competition & the tools for reviewing 21:12:46 one thing that came up this week was whether ~ubuntu-dev should be added to the ~ubuntu-app-review-contributors team 21:12:52 thoughts? 21:14:16 sounds like it makes sense 21:14:36 the more the arb process is integrated in the rest of ubuntu, the better 21:14:39 (imho) 21:15:05 it'd allow any ubuntu developer to commit to the branches dholbach is importing, and let them comment & change state of apps on myapps 21:15:11 which I think is fine 21:15:26 assuming you find the branches useful 21:15:59 well, remember that ubuntu-app-review-contributors gets special access in MyApps 21:16:15 do we want to grant that to all ubuntu-devs? 21:16:22 right, that's what I'm asking 21:16:47 it seems like some kind of verification step makes sense 21:16:55 since changing the myapps state doesn't affect a whole lot unless they're rejected 21:17:07 I guess in that case they might as well just join #ubuntu-arb and ask to be added 21:17:23 (or mail or whatever) 21:17:28 I thought review contributors could do more than just change state? 21:18:05 what's the concern? that someone might do something malicious? 21:19:14 more concerned about accidental disruptive changes, from people who don't know the interface yet 21:19:18 it's still a little buggy 21:19:45 but, if they really only have access to comment and non-destructive state changes, then I have no concern 21:19:59 it is worth asking ubuntu-dev if they *want* to be added though 21:20:18 aren't there default notifications sent out to review contributors? 21:20:39 or, is that only direct to the arb mailing list, and not individual notifications? 21:20:48 that's what dholbach was checking, he said he hadn't received any 21:21:44 is that because they're going to ubuntu-app-review-board members? or to the mailing list? 21:21:52 to the mailing list 21:22:36 ok, limited access and not spamming ubuntu-devs are my only concerns 21:23:04 if that's all sorted, and ubuntu-dev wants to be added, I'm fine with it 21:23:04 alright 21:23:26 sounds reasonable 21:23:29 +1 21:23:35 another possibility is to just ask achuni to grant access to all ubuntu-dev, without joining up the launchpad teams 21:23:35 it's a bit hard to ask a team that encompasses everyone with upload rights, ~ubuntu-dev is often added to other teams 21:24:07 that could work 21:24:12 * ajmitch just wants more people reviewing 21:24:32 yeah, making that as easy as possible is a good idea 21:25:06 though, there something neat about being granted priviledges when you join a team :) 21:25:33 ideally we'd have some active arb helpers who could then go on to the arb team (election, appointment, whatever) & vote on apps 21:26:13 the term length is indefinite in LP for some reason, but I know we all won't want to do this forever :) 21:29:02 ok, that vaguely covers the recruiting agenda item from last month 21:30:00 * ajmitch isn't sure if any of us have managed to set aside a regular reviewing time lately, so will skip that :) 21:30:24 #topic General state of the ARB queue 21:30:36 ajmitch: hmmm... we all had term expirations last I checked... 21:30:39 I'm worried that applications are getting lost in the voting process 21:30:50 wendar: I checked the other day, we no longer do 21:31:20 ajmitch: how odd. I know mine's coming up soon 21:31:41 https://launchpad.net/~app-review-board/+members shows no expiry dates 21:32:16 ajmitch: yup, you're right 21:32:27 ajmitch: well, it's 2 years after start anyway 21:32:30 it's a life sentence :) 21:32:41 oh dear 21:33:03 so, 3 of us are out this September 21:33:14 but, I don't think we should wait until then to add new people 21:33:39 no, nominally there are 7 on the board, but a couple haven't been heard from for quite some time 21:33:46 really, I'd be happy to treat it as more of a promotion process 21:33:50 so would I 21:34:06 we'd still need to do the poll of all ubuntu-devs 21:34:12 but, it could be on a one-off basis 21:34:26 & not require adjusting quorum for votes on apps, even universe just requred 2 +1s from MOTUs for new apps 21:34:48 yeah, quorum is a fixed number, shouldn't vary by the size of the board 21:35:03 (it already is that way, so no change needed) 21:35:14 we've struggled to get 3 votes lately, I know everyone's been busy (myself included) 21:35:37 ajmitch: yes, I'm thinking I may switch to making voting my first priority 21:35:43 I came across an example of a lens that had the vote started about 7 weeks ago, but never got to +3 21:35:52 especially if we get some regular arb contributors 21:36:19 what do you think of a trello board for being able to see the state of the apps being worked on & reviewed? too much duplication? 21:36:23 yeah I think it makes sense priorotising voting, the last thing we want is a backlog of perfectly good apps. 21:36:25 reviewing an app that's already been cleaned up takes a lot less time than cleaning up a new one 21:36:40 ajmitch: yeah, I wondered about using trello too 21:36:45 really, the arb's only role should need to be voting 21:37:06 ajmitch: it doesn't have to be a lot of work to maintain trello, if it's just the name and link for each app 21:37:13 we can all do package clean up if we want, but voting is the main task 21:37:23 wendar: right 21:37:48 trello is far, far simpler to maintain than a wiki page for app status :) 21:37:52 that way if you put an app up for vote, move it to the voting list in trello so we can see what to look at 21:38:00 * ajmitch uses it a bit at work now 21:38:21 and we can grant arb contributors full edit rights on trello 21:38:27 yep 21:38:45 and, any app submitter can quickly check the status of their app 21:38:47 stgraber, highvoltage: in favour of it? 21:38:58 yep 21:40:17 sounds good 21:40:17 #action ajmitch to set up trello board for tracking application votes & reviewer notes 21:40:17 * meetingology ajmitch to set up trello board for tracking application votes & reviewer notes 21:40:23 ok 21:40:52 * ajmitch thought this weekend was going to be completely full with work, but it seems next weekend will be 21:41:24 dholbach's suggested this apps sprint this week, I'll probably be lurking around #ubuntu-arb in the evenings as usual 21:42:06 not sure how crazy everyones' schedules are, but it'd be nice to get through a few apps for the competition over the next few days 21:42:48 Sunday is okay for me this week 21:42:57 and Wednesday is a holiday 21:43:11 lucky :) 21:43:13 but otherwise I've got a couple hours in the morning and a couple in the evening 21:43:22 so, I can do short snippets 21:43:30 any time is helpful 21:43:36 but, not big stuff 21:43:46 like, a whole app review usually takes me 4 hours 21:43:56 (with finding and fixing bugs) 21:43:59 I can understand that, it can be quite involved 21:44:09 we'll try & get some cleaned up apps for voting on 21:44:10 I know I've got a couple that are just about ready to go up for vote 21:44:13 they should take less time 21:44:18 so, I can focus on those for this week 21:44:29 and, on voting on the ones that are already up for vote 21:44:59 does trello let you assign a task to a person/ 21:45:00 ? 21:45:12 yes 21:45:21 just drag their icon onto the card 21:45:31 cool, that'll help 21:45:38 I'll probably need to get the email you use for trello so I can add people 21:45:51 like, when I'm working on an app, I can put it in an active channel, and then tag it with my user 21:46:28 because honestly, right now it'll take me 30minutes just to find all my active apps, check on their status, and figure out what the next step is for each :( 21:46:48 yeah, and you can leave comments on each card, it's fairly quick to use 21:47:57 okay, that'll help alot :) 21:48:08 with that, is there any other business to talk about? 21:48:15 apart from the meeting time & the next chair 21:50:01 sounds like not :) 21:50:32 ok :) 21:50:51 does this meeting time still work for people, and who volunteers to be the next chair? :) 21:53:07 * ajmitch will have to volunteer someone for it soon 21:53:31 highvoltage: you're next alphabetically, available for it next month? 21:53:46 ajmitch: ok 21:54:01 thanks 21:54:55 next meeting at 21:00UTC on 27 july 21:54:59 #endmeeting