21:06:18 <stgraber> #startmeeting
21:06:18 <meetingology> Meeting started Mon May 28 21:06:18 2012 UTC.  The chair is stgraber. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
21:06:18 <meetingology> 
21:06:18 <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
21:06:20 <stgraber> fine :)
21:06:54 <stgraber> #topic Action Review
21:06:56 <cjwatson> the main thing I see not on the agenda is the Mythbuntu LTS plan
21:06:59 <cjwatson> FWIW
21:07:13 <stgraber> wiki doesn't list anything, so I guess we're good there?
21:08:02 <stgraber> #topic Mythbuntu LTS plan
21:08:04 <stgraber> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-May/001258.html
21:08:25 <stgraber> we don't have quorum but I guess we can at least look at it and discuss it
21:08:40 <cjwatson> three is quorate
21:09:40 <stgraber> oh right, forgot we're just 6
21:10:01 <cjwatson> I've just rather belatedly followed up to the list with my thoughts
21:10:22 <soren> Yeah, without superm here, I'd rather do e-mail as well.
21:10:31 <soren> superm1, I mean.
21:10:34 <cjwatson> basically that I can see some possible problems but it seems a reasonable thing to try
21:10:45 <cjwatson> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2012-May/001277.html
21:12:01 <soren> It'll be interesting to see. If it works out well, I wouldn't be surprised if we saw more like this.
21:12:34 <cjwatson> I do worry a bit about intermediate bitrot; there is some devil in the detail.
21:13:11 <cjwatson> Probably not enough to scupper the idea in the case of Mythbuntu.  A flavour with wider focus might have more difficulty, I feel.
21:13:34 <stgraber> if we decide to allow it, we'll need to update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RecognizedFlavors to reflect this as they'll by definition won't meet the "Must have a proven track record of participating in at least 2 non-LTS releases before applying to TechnicalBoard for LTS designation."
21:14:12 <cjwatson> Huh?  Mythbuntu has participated in considerably more than two non-LTS releases.
21:14:28 <cjwatson> I don't think it would be a brilliant idea to allow it for entirely new flavours.
21:14:46 <cjwatson> Two years is too long a period for any kind of agility in trying out new things.
21:15:37 <stgraber> hmm, indeed, reading it again, I didn't interpret this properly ;) For some reason I parsed that as we want them to release two consecutive release prior to an LTS, but that's indeed not what it says :)
21:17:04 <cjwatson> No, it was intended as "must not be total newcomers" really
21:18:31 <stgraber> right, so should we just continue the discussion with Mario on the mailing-list?
21:18:47 <cjwatson> Sounds good.
21:19:06 <stgraber> #topic Select a chair for the next meeting
21:19:07 <cjwatson> At least he's had a reply now :)
21:19:35 <stgraber> cjwatson: so I guess next chair in the list is you?
21:19:40 <cjwatson> Yep
21:19:45 * cjwatson checks the calendar
21:20:02 <cjwatson> And I believe I'm even around that day
21:20:07 <stgraber> #action cjwatson to chair the next TB meeting (11th of June)
21:20:07 * meetingology cjwatson to chair the next TB meeting (11th of June)
21:20:23 <stgraber> #topic AOB
21:20:30 <stgraber> anything?
21:20:52 <soren> Not from me.
21:20:55 <cjwatson> Nor I
21:21:01 <stgraber> alright
21:21:04 <stgraber> #endmeeting