#title #ubuntu-meeting Meeting Meeting started by czajkowski at 20:01:22 UTC. The full logs are available at http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2011/ubuntu-meeting.2011-11-15-20.01.log.html . == Meeting summary == ''LINK:'' https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Agenda (czajkowski, 20:02:00) ''LINK:'' https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MyanmarTeam/ApprovalApplication (czajkowski, 20:03:51) ''LINK:'' http://enblog.u4mm.com (kokoye2007, 20:05:05) *UDS blueprint ''LINK:'' https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-p-lococouncil (czajkowski, 20:13:50) *LTP renaming the main team page for teams ''LINK:'' http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ (czajkowski, 20:20:53) ''ACTION:'' itnet7 work with the dev team to start that this week please (czajkowski, 20:24:21) ''ACTION:'' itnet7 work with the dev team to start a blog post re team name display on loco.ubuntu.com/teams (czajkowski, 20:24:39) *Larger teams to follow the example led by USA and follow state/provence break down ''ACTION:'' legg to draf blog post on larger teams being broken down into smaller teams like USA (czajkowski, 20:30:50) *loco teams reappoval Meeting ended at 20:33:21 UTC. == Votes == == Action items == * itnet7 work with the dev team to start that this week please * itnet7 work with the dev team to start a blog post re team name display on loco.ubuntu.com/teams * legg to draf blog post on larger teams being broken down into smaller teams like USA == Action items, by person == * itnet7 ** itnet7 work with the dev team to start that this week please ** itnet7 work with the dev team to start a blog post re team name display on loco.ubuntu.com/teams == People present (lines said) == * czajkowski (87) * itnet7 (22) * leogg (10) * meetingology (10) * bonepyaesone (9) * AlanBell (7) * huats (4) * kokoye2007 (4) * TH_ (3) * ubottu (1) == Full Log == 20:01:22 #startmeeting 20:01:22 Meeting started Tue Nov 15 20:01:22 2011 UTC. The chair is czajkowski. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot. 20:01:22 20:01:22 Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired 20:02:00 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Agenda 20:02:23 hmm 20:02:34 tonights agenda https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Agenda 20:03:25 kokoye2007: ready ? 20:03:30 yeah 20:03:41 :) 20:03:51 #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MyanmarTeam/ApprovalApplication 20:03:56 ok 20:03:59 we are from ubuntu-mm bonepyaesone TH_ 20:04:07 kokoye2007: so want to tell us about your team ? 20:04:20 and what kind of things ye guys do in your loco please? 20:05:05 http://enblog.u4mm.com 20:05:14 ok. we've done a lot of events in past 3 years 20:05:30 here, now sorry 20:05:52 especially introduction ubuntu to public 20:06:00 now more active than before 20:06:26 ok, the wiki page seems a bit broken is it just my connection folks ? 20:07:11 you mention in your road map about a local repository, can you tell us more about this ? 20:08:02 bonepyaesone: TH_ kokoye2007 ? 20:08:13 everything is looking good from me czajkowski ! 20:08:36 local repository is more important for our country because our country connection 20:08:50 Approval-wise 20:09:20 huats: leogg any other thoughts folks ? 20:09:24 we'll set up a repo server and syn every 2 week. And we distribute them as offline repo 20:09:34 :D 20:09:59 I am quite happy to see so many pics 20:10:07 seems like a good team actions 20:10:08 I mean... wiki page 20:10:14 but very good solid work 20:10:20 ok my only suggestion is for team reports folks 20:10:21 :D 20:10:26 are we ready to vote so ? 20:10:31 not from me, looks you guys been doing a great job 20:10:41 I'm ready 20:11:06 #voters leogg itnet7 huats czajkowski 20:11:06 Current voters: czajkowski huats itnet7 leogg 20:11:10 #vote 20:11:10 Please vote on: 20:11:10 Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (private votes don't work yet, but when they do it will be by messaging the channel followed by +1/-1/+0 to me) 20:11:19 +1 20:11:21 +1 20:11:22 +1 20:11:34 vote needs a subject 20:11:45 * AlanBell goes to file a bug 20:11:49 itnet7: ping 20:12:22 :D 20:12:25 +1 20:12:27 sorry... 20:12:30 #endvote 20:12:30 No vote in progress 20:12:52 clearly me and the bot are not going to see eye to eye 20:13:03 you will learn to love each other! 20:13:04 with 4 +1s you are now an approved loco 20:13:15 leogg: can you add to approved teams please 20:13:19 Please, defintely share more of what your team is doing through team reports!! 20:13:24 czajkowski, sure! 20:13:29 leogg: thanks 20:13:37 #topic UDS blueprint 20:13:39 Thank you czajkowski AlanBell itnet7 and leogg 20:13:44 Congrats!! 20:13:47 Thank czajkowski AlanBell itnet7 leogg 20:13:50 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/community-p-lococouncil 20:13:52 thank you all 20:13:53 yeah!! 20:13:58 kokoye2007, bonepyaesone, congrats and thank you! 20:14:11 ok so for the remainder of the meeting we're going to look at the bp and add some of the action items to it 20:14:17 and review some of the items that came up 20:14:26 so twinnings idea came from popey suggestion 20:14:32 and I think it went down well at UDS 20:14:56 the idea being that an Approved loco would be twinned with an unapproved loco and help them in how to get started 20:15:00 and give them ideas 20:15:05 so we needed to come up with teams 20:15:16 which I think we more or less have done so ? 20:15:21 Ubuntu UK 20:15:28 Ubuntu France 20:15:33 Ubuntu Florida 20:15:38 aye 20:15:44 Ubuntu Italy 20:15:59 leogg: what team did you suggest? 20:16:19 czajkowski, Ubuntu Nicaragua with Ubuntu Costa Rica 20:16:27 Ubuntu UK is up for it (no idea who to twin with) 20:16:53 bug 890843 has been reported 20:16:53 ok so that's 5 20:16:55 Launchpad bug 890843 in Ubuntu IRC Bots "#vote doesn't work without a subject" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/890843 20:17:09 did we habe a 6th in mind ? 20:17:27 is there an approved team we think that has the time to help on this ? 20:17:44 or should we stick with 5 for this cycle and see how it works out 20:17:53 I think we should stick with 5 20:17:56 ok 20:18:02 just my opinion though 20:18:06 itnet7++ 20:18:20 so we're agreed on thos teams and we need to contact their team contacts which I think we have done bar Italy to make sure they are up for it 20:18:32 and then create the bugs so we can track this during the cycle 20:18:39 Yup 20:18:47 I really think this could work and then expand for furture cycles 20:18:49 * AlanBell wonders if itnet7++ makes itnet8 20:18:59 ;-) AlanBell ! 20:19:01 itnet7: do you have a team in mind for the Florida loco ? 20:19:08 AlanBell, ;) 20:19:21 czajkowski: I was doing a bit of research, but haven't really decided 20:19:53 I would like to try and pick a newer team 20:20:01 itnet7: ok, we'll create the bugs this week at least for those teams that are menotoring and then add the unapproved teams to it 20:20:04 itnet7: ok 20:20:09 need to find a team for Ubuntu UK also 20:20:36 #topic LTP renaming the main team page for teams 20:20:53 #link http://loco.ubuntu.com/teams/ 20:21:03 this topic has been bouncing around for some time 20:21:41 * AlanBell wants to replace it with a second level of maps 20:21:42 if you land here on this page looking for a team, it's hard to find the team you are looking for as they all have their own way of naming themselves 20:21:45 which is fine 20:22:16 what was proposed and agreed at UDS was the *display name* on this page alone would be changed by the developers 20:22:33 so it would read Team name loco 20:22:53 making it easier to find your team name if you are looking for infomation on one 20:23:18 so I think we should do a joint blog post with the LTP developers and explain in more detail the benfit of doing so 20:23:27 and to make it clear that nothing else is changing on the team name 20:23:31 Sounds good to me 20:23:34 just the display name on the one page 20:23:48 itnet7: can you take an action item to work with the dev team to start that this week please 20:24:02 Sure 20:24:21 #action itnet7 work with the dev team to start that this week please 20:24:21 * meetingology itnet7 work with the dev team to start that this week please 20:24:39 #action itnet7 work with the dev team to start a blog post re team name display on loco.ubuntu.com/teams 20:24:39 * meetingology itnet7 work with the dev team to start a blog post re team name display on loco.ubuntu.com/teams 20:24:51 ok 20:24:52 thanks 20:25:06 I will add that to the blueprint after work today 20:25:29 #topic Larger teams to follow the example led by USA and follow state/provence break down 20:26:30 This was discussed again at UDS and the thought behind it was that counteries which are rather large such as Australia, Canada and possibly Brazil who have already done this should follow the example of USA 20:27:05 one main team and sub teams can be created depending on the level of activity in an provence/state like USA 20:27:34 It would benefit if some areas are very active so cd allocation would go to one state if they were approved rather that one country 20:27:48 in the future as teams grow it would be harder to then do this 20:28:10 so planning for team growth now for 2+ years and being pro active rather than being re active would make more sense 20:28:36 huats: itnet7 leogg any comments? 20:28:53 I agree 20:28:59 I agree that it would be a good idea, but I think you've pretty much covered the whys 20:29:15 me too, it makes perfectly sense to me 20:29:43 ok so we need to again explain this carefuly and clearly to teams so they don't get upset or worry. the reasons for this and the benefits for doing so 20:29:56 huats: leogg care to take an action item to draft this blog post please ? 20:30:18 sure 20:30:21 leogg: thanks 20:30:50 #action legg to draf blog post on larger teams being broken down into smaller teams like USA 20:30:50 * meetingology legg to draf blog post on larger teams being broken down into smaller teams like USA 20:30:59 ok 20:31:12 #topic loco teams reappoval 20:31:33 status update on this, huats created the teams for re approval for this cycle 20:31:42 already we have teams applying which is great to see! 20:31:50 +1 20:31:51 and we'll keep working on that this cycle 20:32:21 we only have 9 for re approval, but hopefully with mentoring and twining of teams we can see more approvals coming up through the ranks in the near future. 20:32:28 anyone have anything else to comment on ? 20:33:13 I don't really have any 20:33:18 nope ok 20:33:21 #endmeeting Generated by MeetBot 0.1.5 (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot)