16:06:09 <utlemming> #startmeeting
16:06:09 <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Sep 27 16:06:09 2011 UTC.  The chair is utlemming. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlanBell/mootbot.
16:06:09 <meetingology> 
16:06:09 <meetingology> Available commands: #accept #accepted #action #agree #agreed #chair #commands #endmeeting #endvote #halp #help #idea #info #link #lurk #meetingname #meetingtopic #nick #progress #rejected #replay #restrictlogs #save #startmeeting #subtopic #topic #unchair #undo #unlurk #vote #voters #votesrequired
16:06:21 <utlemming> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
16:07:10 <AlanBell> hmm
16:07:24 <AlanBell> utlemming: I think the space before [topic] might be the issue there
16:07:35 <utlemming> yeah....
16:07:48 <utlemming> #meetingtopic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
16:07:59 <Daviey> Spamaps couldn't be here. hggdh should hopefully be here later, lets carry it to later in the meeting
16:08:04 <utlemming> lol...
16:08:09 <utlemming> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
16:08:23 <utlemming> #subtopic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
16:09:12 <utlemming> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
16:09:13 * hggdh gets in meeting now
16:09:44 <utlemming> okay, so from the previous meeting, it doesn't look like there is any follow up
16:09:56 <utlemming> does anyone have anything from it?
16:09:57 <Daviey> hggdh: ah, can you comment?
16:11:26 <hggdh> I have not seen it yet -- was pretty much out for the beginning of last week, and then we have beta 2
16:11:31 <Daviey> utlemming: perhaps hggdh is having net troubles, lets come back.
16:11:40 <smoser> reload the page, utlemming
16:11:53 <smoser> there was a action item there (that i updated like 32 seconds ago)
16:12:06 <utlemming> ah, thank you kindly smoser
16:12:10 <hggdh> I will look at it this afternoon -- seems to be not difficult to set up
16:12:13 <utlemming> the prior action was hggdh and SpamapS to discuss SRU verification work for bug 750371 at next meeting or before
16:12:16 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 750371 in squid (Ubuntu Maverick) "squid causing /var to stay busy during shutdown" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/750371
16:12:27 <Daviey> utlemming should have known that.
16:12:32 <Daviey> hggdh: okay, can you sync up with Clint soon?
16:12:39 <hggdh> Daviey: yes, will do
16:13:01 <Daviey> super!
16:13:02 <Daviey> utlemming: next?
16:13:14 <utlemming> #action hggdh and SpamapS to discuss SRU verification work for bug 750371 at next meeting or before
16:13:14 * meetingology hggdh and SpamapS to discuss SRU verification work for bug 750371 at next meeting or before
16:13:16 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 750371 in squid (Ubuntu Maverick) "squid causing /var to stay busy during shutdown" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/750371
16:13:23 <utlemming> #topic Oneiric Development
16:13:34 <utlemming> Daviey: how is Oneiric moving along?
16:13:59 <Daviey> Dandy!
16:14:08 <Daviey> We don't have that many knowns still to deal with
16:14:14 <Daviey> I would like to run through them
16:14:29 <Daviey> bug 655533, needs someone to work on it
16:14:30 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 655533 in likewise-open (Ubuntu Oneiric) "[master] package likewise-open 5.4.0.42111-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655533
16:14:50 <Daviey> install likewise-open on natty, and do an upgrade test to oneiric
16:14:50 <Daviey> any volunteers?
16:15:48 <utlemming> I took an initial look at it, but was unable to replicate it.
16:15:50 <Daviey> nobody?
16:16:01 <jamespage> Daviey: lemme take a look at it
16:16:04 <Daviey> Okay, i'll take that to..
16:16:13 <Daviey> ok, great jamespage to the rescue!
16:16:27 <utlemming> #action jamespage to look at bug 655533
16:16:27 * meetingology jamespage to look at bug 655533
16:16:28 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 655533 in likewise-open (Ubuntu Oneiric) "[master] package likewise-open 5.4.0.42111-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/655533
16:16:30 <Daviey> bug 801494, is blocked on the udev bug
16:16:30 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 801494 in Ubuntu "Multi part LVM layout: system fails to boot due to missing volumes" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/801494
16:16:34 <Daviey> we think it might be the same issue
16:16:48 <Daviey> We could try adam_g's or hallyn's hack fix.. to prove it
16:17:13 <hallyn> mine is not for the more general udev bug, only for vgchange hangs during boot
16:17:22 <Daviey> ah
16:17:26 <hallyn> i've not been able to deduce a cause for the udev hang
16:17:33 <hallyn> that one has no lvm portion to it
16:17:44 <smoser> i've reproduce bug 833783 with an additional 'udevadm settle'.
16:17:45 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 833783 in udev (Ubuntu Oneiric) "boot failure: can't open /root/dev/console: no such file" [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/833783
16:17:48 <hallyn> and it's heisenbug from hell
16:17:58 <Daviey> jamespage: would you be able to sync with adam to try to reproduce it with a sleep()?
16:18:06 <smoser> basically, we *know* that the fix suggested only reduces the window for error.
16:18:25 <jamespage> Daviey: yep
16:18:32 <hallyn> right i'm not happy with papering over
16:18:35 <smoser> adam_g, verified that 'udevadm --exit' drops events.
16:18:48 <Daviey> smoser: Yep, but if we can prove it's the same issue - we are happy.
16:18:53 <hallyn> can we get some jhunt help this week?
16:19:09 <Daviey> hallyn: he is looking at it today
16:19:13 <hallyn> awesome!
16:19:15 <jamespage> \o/
16:19:16 <Daviey> I have raised it as a prioritty issue.
16:19:31 <smoser> Daviey, just to clarify, you're suggesting that adding 'sleep X' in a race condition would "prove" something :)
16:19:50 <Daviey> smoser: I'm suggesting that it proves it to be the same bug.
16:20:01 <smoser> i dont think so.
16:20:08 <Daviey> smoser: Do you disagree that is the best action?
16:20:30 <smoser> i dont knwo what it would buy us
16:20:32 <smoser> seriously.
16:20:40 <smoser> it would mean that we know that timing changes things
16:20:42 <smoser> which we know
16:20:48 <rbasak> and as we speak I just hit it again :-/
16:21:11 <jamespage> OK - I have a system I can reproduce that but 100% of the time on - lemme catchup with adam_g and jhunt to see what the best way forwards is
16:21:16 <smoser> i'm not *just* being a jerk.
16:21:18 <smoser> i'm serious
16:21:28 <Daviey> smoser: Okay.. i disagree.. if we can work around it in a development enviroment, to prove it is the same issue, we can mark it as a dupe.
16:21:41 <Daviey> Then we can move on, and verify once jhunt has done his magic.
16:22:09 <Daviey> smoser: Rather than saying we are doing it wrong, suggestions for an action are more constructive.
16:22:24 <Daviey> It seems cheap to reproduce it with the sleep hack.
16:22:25 <hallyn> Daviey: it's not smoser's fault there isn't a better answer for now :)
16:22:28 <smoser> i'm suggesting you save time.
16:22:39 <hallyn> Daviey: I think for now we keep them non-duped, and hope that the fix for one fixes the other
16:22:43 <Daviey> smoser: seriosuly, how long does it take to test the sleep?
16:22:46 <smoser> and not spend time trying to get more information that would lead you to the same amount of un-knowledge.
16:22:59 <smoser> but, sure, try 'sleep 3'.
16:23:00 <hallyn> Daviey: I'm more worried about erroneously marking something as a dup.  that usually turns out bad
16:23:05 <smoser> cause 3 is a magic number.
16:23:14 <hallyn> i.e., there might be a fix for bug 1, but someone testing for bug 2 says "that's not a good fix"
16:23:15 <Ursinha> hallyn, +1
16:23:15 <Daviey> we've probably wasted more time arguing the toss about this, than we would have JFDI'ing it.
16:23:17 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1 in Ubuntu "Microsoft has a majority market share" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
16:23:18 <ubottu> Error: Launchpad bug 2 could not be found
16:23:22 <smoser> i'll stop now.
16:23:40 <hallyn> Daviey: it's not about waste of time testing.  I think you should not mark it a dup based on that test.
16:23:49 <hallyn> putting in a comment with the result, though, is helpful.
16:23:55 <Daviey> hallyn: Which is why i suggested we check it when the udev fix lands, but at least i can mentally consider it a dupe - and start worrying less about it.
16:24:04 <hallyn> Daviey: sounds good :)
16:24:32 <utlemming> let's table the current discussion and move on
16:24:34 <Daviey> moving on..
16:24:38 <utlemming> #action Daviey, smoser, hallyn to follow up on bug 801494
16:24:38 * meetingology Daviey, smoser, hallyn to follow up on bug 801494
16:24:39 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 801494 in Ubuntu "Multi part LVM layout: system fails to boot due to missing volumes" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/801494
16:24:47 <Daviey> bug 827496, ikonia has offered to try and resolve
16:24:48 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 827496 in cobbler (Ubuntu) "cobbler kickstart metadata dont affect ubuntu preseed " [High,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827496
16:25:10 <Daviey> and i believe bug 831121.. He might want a hand, so listen out to cries for help.
16:25:11 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 831121 in dovecot-antispam (Ubuntu Oneiric) "dovecot-antispam version 1.4~rc3-1 failed to build in oneiric" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/831121
16:25:40 <Daviey> bug 832507, rbasak - have you been able to prepare a trunk patch?
16:25:42 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 832507 in nova (Ubuntu) "console.log grows indefinitely" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/832507
16:26:03 <rbasak> Yes, I have one that I think works
16:26:39 <rbasak> jdstrand has the libvirt fix ready now. I still need to see the whole system working for myself and test the edge cases
16:26:40 <Daviey> rbasak: Are you likely going to be able to push a merge proposal to upstream trunk by EoD?
16:27:19 <rbasak> No, the patch isn't ready for upstream
16:27:23 <smoser> rbasak, can you point us at your current branch ?
16:27:40 <Daviey> smoser: he's created a PPA based on the staged upload
16:27:48 <Daviey> which we should be able to test in the lab.
16:28:02 <Daviey> (with libvirt disabled, or jdstrands patch)
16:28:05 <rbasak> I found a bug in the PPA, I made an error during one of my many rebases
16:28:07 <smoser> branch ?
16:28:23 <rbasak> The latest branch I have is git, against nova's git upstream. I can push that to github if you'd like to see it?
16:28:40 <smoser> yeah, please. i'm just curious.
16:29:00 <hallyn> fwiw I'm still trying to figure out bug 842845 - something's funky in the nova->libvirt bindings i think.  the container is running, nova doesn't know about it.
16:29:01 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 842845 in libvirt (Ubuntu Oneiric) "problems starting multiple lxc instances concurrently" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/842845
16:29:14 <Daviey> hallyn: that was the next bug on my hit list
16:29:15 <Daviey> :)
16:29:40 <Daviey> hallyn: Is it still viable for a fix in Oneiric release?
16:30:04 <hallyn> Daviey: I think so.  It seems like it should be a simple misunderstanding somewhere
16:30:32 <hallyn> but i need time to figure out how nova is getting and interpreting log data from the container startup
16:30:35 <Daviey> hallyn: Great.. do keep the bug updated with status. :)
16:30:41 <hallyn> when i get some i will :)
16:30:57 <Daviey> hallyn: If you want some help, do shout.
16:30:57 <Daviey> moving on..
16:31:02 <hallyn> thx
16:31:04 <Daviey> bug 827590 smoser, is that fix committed to the staged branch?
16:31:05 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 827590 in nova (Ubuntu Oneiric) "cloud-init does not mount ephemeral0 on /mnt in nova" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827590
16:31:33 <smoser> i'm fairly sure that is fix-released
16:32:00 <Daviey> updted
16:32:19 <Daviey> smoser: if this is not the case, can you re-open?
16:32:34 <rbasak> smoser: https://github.com/basak/nova/commits/master/
16:32:44 <Daviey> bug 845788
16:32:46 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 845788 in glance (Ubuntu) "update_image in glance.client doesn't add content-length so the swift backend can't chunk" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/845788
16:33:00 <Daviey> smoser: ^^ status?
16:33:00 <smoser> thank you rbasak
16:33:15 <smoser> zul, are you ok for me to upload that ?
16:33:51 <rbasak> (I will probably revise/squash this)
16:33:53 <smoser> or is there something else you were wanting to get in there... zul..
16:34:14 <smoser> rbasak, well, for better or worse, with gerrit and openstack, all merge commits are squashed !
16:34:32 <rbasak> sounds like fun :)
16:34:41 <Daviey> smoser: take it out-of-meeting, but if we can get that Fix Released by this time tomorrow it would be good.
16:34:42 <zul> smoser: i need to go through the list for glance/nova to make sure we arent missing that we should have
16:34:44 * smoser is embarrased as he has to admit that bzr does a better job of merging branches than git does ... at least that gerrit uses.
16:35:59 <Daviey> bug 856530 , adam_g has a merge proposal .. does someone in ~ubuntu-server-dev / ~core-dev want to review that?
16:36:00 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 856530 in nova (Ubuntu Oneiric) "nova user should not be in the nogroup group" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/856530
16:36:30 <Daviey> okay, i'll do that
16:36:43 <Daviey> bug 854614 smoser, fixed in staged branch?
16:36:45 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 854614 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "metadata service local-hostname is not fqdn" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/854614
16:36:45 <zul> Daviey:  i did this morning its already been merged
16:36:51 <zul> merged as well
16:36:56 <Daviey> zul: ok, great!
16:37:22 <Daviey> Now, what other bugs are we missing?
16:37:40 <zul> the samba winbind one i need to look at
16:37:47 <smoser> checking
16:38:09 <smoser> it would appear to be
16:38:12 <zul> and the need to fix keystone apparently
16:38:17 <Daviey> zul: bug number?
16:38:29 <zul> Daviey: dont have it off the top of my head
16:38:43 <Daviey> zul: can you let me know what it is after the meeting?
16:38:52 <zul> Daviey: ack
16:39:14 <Daviey> zul: I suspect SI will be helping with keystone.. shame they are not in the meeting.
16:39:45 <zul> i suspect most of the issues i already fixed in the upstream branch anyways
16:40:01 <zul> just need to roll a new tarball
16:40:17 <Daviey> Any Juju people here?
16:40:40 <smoser> wait. roll a new tarball ?
16:40:45 <smoser> of what ?
16:40:53 <zul> smoser:  keystone bug fixes
16:41:56 <lynxman> Daviey: SI is in the meeting :)
16:42:05 * smoser publicly apologizes for not understanding completely the bug that he was discussing above, and for being rude to daviey.
16:42:15 <Daviey> smoser: shut up. :)
16:42:28 <utlemming> #action smoser and daviey to make up
16:42:28 * meetingology smoser and daviey to make up
16:42:30 <lynxman> Daviey: negronjl is working with iamfuzz in order to provide a keystone patch (coordinating with zul)
16:42:35 <Ursinha> lol
16:42:43 <Daviey> lynxman: Great!
16:42:47 <SpamapS> Still on "Oneiric Development" ? you guys been discussing the weather in here?
16:42:47 <lynxman> Ursinha: we'll take pictures
16:43:04 <Daviey> Ursinha: have anything concerning you?
16:43:08 <smoser> there is lots of oneiric development to discuss.
16:43:16 <Ursinha> Daviey, not really no, sir
16:43:27 <Daviey> SpamapS: Ah!  Anything juju of concern?
16:44:12 <Daviey> utlemming: we should probably move on.
16:44:18 <lynxman> I'd like to point out bugs #818177 and #854899
16:44:18 <SpamapS> Just as an FYI, I'm finishing up some intense testing of juju before uploading the renamed package today..
16:44:20 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 854899 in puppet (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update to puppet-2.7.3" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/854899
16:44:21 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 818177 in udev (Ubuntu Oneiric) "boot failures caused by udev race" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/818177
16:44:36 <lynxman> SpamapS: great, I'll tailgate you on that one for macports
16:44:38 <Daviey> SpamapS: awesome
16:44:53 <utlemming> If anyone has any other Oneiric development topics, please feel free to add to the agenda later.
16:44:56 <SpamapS> There will also be an FFe for another revision of Juju which will basically be the "eureka" release of Juju .. including local dev and some repository stuff.
16:44:57 <utlemming> Moving on...
16:45:05 <utlemming> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
16:45:08 <hallyn> lynxman: yes, bug 818177 was the one i was really hoping jhunt would look at
16:45:14 <Daviey> lynxman: You do realise most of the meeting has been talking about the second bug you mentioned? :)
16:45:28 <lynxman> Daviey: I know, but still I had to ;)
16:45:29 <Daviey> Events!
16:45:41 <utlemming> I believe that there is an Open Stack event next week
16:45:52 <lynxman> utlemming: ODS next week in Boston
16:45:52 <Daviey> ODS
16:45:52 <Daviey> http://summit.openstack.org/ - lots of the team will be there.
16:45:56 <Daviey> (I should mention that today is the deadline for raising blueprints for that summit)
16:46:07 <SpamapS> Have we raised any?
16:46:20 <zul> yeah 2
16:46:23 <SpamapS> I may throw one in about S3 test suite for swift and/or using CEPH
16:46:37 <utlemming> #action Deadline for ODS is today
16:46:37 * meetingology Deadline for ODS is today
16:46:46 <Daviey> I have one pending.
16:46:46 <Daviey> maybe 2. lets take that out of meeting
16:46:48 <Daviey> When does Oneiric release by the way?
16:46:48 <SpamapS> Given the significant tap dancing we've had to do to make juju work with nova-objectstore since its "s3-like"
16:47:04 <utlemming> If there are no other events, lets move on
16:47:10 <utlemming> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
16:47:11 <SpamapS> UDS!
16:47:21 <SpamapS> Its close enough to mention UDS :)
16:47:36 <Daviey> hggdh: Hello!
16:47:50 <hggdh> Daviey: yo
16:48:02 <utlemming> hggdh: Do you have any news for us?
16:48:03 <Daviey> utlemming: move on, we'll come back
16:48:08 <hggdh> no, no news
16:48:11 <hggdh> ..
16:48:13 <utlemming> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
16:48:17 <smb> Trying to make it shortish: seems at least there is an upstream fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/854050
16:48:19 <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 854050 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/mm/swapfile.c:255" [Medium,Confirmed]
16:48:25 <smb> currently building test kernel there
16:48:33 <smoser> smb, so does that bug actually happen when there is no swap ?
16:48:45 <smb> Otherwise trying to find out where the events on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/854829 go
16:48:46 <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 854829 in xen (Ubuntu) "[Oneiric] Xen HVM: transmit timeouts on emulated 8139cp device" [Medium,Confirmed]
16:49:09 <smb> smoser, In theory it may
16:49:26 <smoser> i just wrote it off as not affecting amd64 on ec2 due to "swapfile.c"
16:49:32 <smb> But maybe not causing the same path to trigger
16:49:52 <Daviey> smb: bug 790712 ?
16:49:54 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 790712 in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) "20110531 i386 server ISO: order 5 allocation failure during install" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/790712
16:49:58 <smb> Daviey, no
16:49:58 <smoser> (there is no swap on amd64 instances on ec2 unless the user configures it, which is unlikely)
16:50:37 <smb> smoser, The explanation somehow was referring to forking under high load which may having some effect in all cases
16:51:04 <Daviey> smb: bug-790712 is not still viable for release?  SRU/P-Series target?
16:51:08 <smb> smoser, But I would just empirically let people affected try with a test kernel and that patch
16:51:17 <smoser> yeah.
16:51:43 <utlemming> #action smoser, utlemming and smb to follow up on Bug 790712
16:51:43 * meetingology smoser, utlemming and smb to follow up on Bug 790712
16:51:45 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 790712 in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) "20110531 i386 server ISO: order 5 allocation failure during install" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/790712
16:51:46 <Daviey> smb: Those two you raised, are they viable for release or SRU/P-series?
16:51:48 <smb> Daviey, There was not much more information since the last time I looked. So as I wrote it is hard to make something off that
16:52:05 <smoser> i think that was the wrong bug number.
16:52:26 <utlemming> #action smoser, utlemming and smb to follow up on Bug 854050
16:52:26 * meetingology smoser, utlemming and smb to follow up on Bug 854050
16:52:27 <Daviey> yah, utlemming
16:52:27 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 854050 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.38/mm/swapfile.c:255" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/854050
16:52:36 <smb> Daviey, first one probably SRU (because it also needs to go into older releases)
16:52:46 <utlemming> And since we're going to run out of time, let's get moving
16:53:01 <Daviey> hggdh: I think smb could do with your re-confirmation on bug 790712
16:53:02 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 790712 in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) "20110531 i386 server ISO: order 5 allocation failure during install" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/790712
16:53:03 <smb> Daviey, Second one probably too since I not yet found the trigger. But maybe
16:53:34 <utlemming> smb: Anything else?
16:53:40 <Daviey> smb: Okay, thanks!  Really appreciate you and your teams stability you have given this cycle.
16:53:43 <smb> no, dont think
16:53:46 <hggdh> Daviey, smb: I will retry it. Since it is sort-of random, I will run a full sequence
16:53:47 <utlemming> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
16:54:00 <utlemming> NCommander: how is the arm world looking?
16:54:08 <NCommander> Looking good towards releasae
16:54:16 <Daviey> \o/
16:54:24 <NCommander> Few minor bugs in the netboot install, but otherwise no complaints from me
16:54:31 <smoser> bug 852225
16:54:33 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 852225 in linux (Ubuntu Oneiric) "ARM kernel writing 32bits to 16 bit register" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/852225
16:54:39 <smoser> woot! fix released.
16:54:44 <Daviey> NCommander: any speciic issues/bugs?
16:54:56 <smoser> utlemming, does that mean those images now boot under qemu ?
16:54:58 <utlemming> :( the lastest qemu images don't boot though, so I need to look at why
16:55:04 <Daviey> NCommander: bug 827705, invalid for u-boot.. is that correct?
16:55:06 <ubottu> Launchpad bug 827705 in u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu) "PXE boot requests non-standard config filename" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/827705
16:55:20 <NCommander> Daviey: guided partition on omap(4) doesn't work peroperly don't have bug number handy
16:55:21 <utlemming> #action utlemming to figure out qemu image situation
16:55:21 * meetingology utlemming to figure out qemu image situation
16:55:31 <NCommander> Daviey: I'm unfamiliar with that bug in question, will get back with you
16:55:38 <Daviey> NCommander: what are the minor bug numbers?
16:55:50 <Daviey> NCommander: thanks
16:56:15 <Daviey> NCommander: When you find that bug number, can you send it over to me please?
16:57:21 <Daviey> if there is nothing else, shall we move on?
16:57:29 <utlemming> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
16:57:45 <utlemming> Do any of our community friends have any topics to raise?
16:58:35 <Daviey> Can we go home now?
16:58:35 <utlemming> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
16:58:49 <utlemming> Daviey: I suppose
16:58:56 <Daviey> I thik we had "open discussion" already TBH
16:59:02 <utlemming> lol, I think so too
16:59:03 <utlemming> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
16:59:20 <Daviey> cobbler-enlist support is doing well.
16:59:29 <SpamapS> Daviey: ^5
16:59:29 <Daviey> so, next week
16:59:37 <utlemming> Tuesday 2011-10-04 at 16:00 UTC
16:59:44 <Daviey> Many of us will be at ODSm but i think the meeting still needs to happen
17:00:02 <Daviey> I will certainly be here, at least in part.
17:00:24 <utlemming> #endmeeting